Paper Titles
Preparation and Property of Electrodeposited Zn-Fe-SiO2 Composite Coating
p.212
Effect of pH Value on the Electrodeposition Potential of Cu-In Alloy Film
p.216
On the Properties of Conductive Adhesive Filled with Electroless Silver Plated Flake Graphite
p.220
Preparing an Environment-Benignly Rare-Earth Based Chemical Conversion Coatings on 6063 Aluminium Alloy
p.224
Cerium-Phytic Acid Passivation Treatment on Galvanized Steel
p.228
Electrodeposited Ni/Al2O3 Composite Coating on NdFeB Permanent Magnets
p.232
The Study of the Electrochemical Graining Process in NaBO2- H3BO3 Solution and Grain Appearance on the Surface of Aluminum Alloy
p.236
Study on Electroless Ni-P Deposit on W-Cu Alloy and its Anti-Corrosion Mechanism
p.240
Sediment Co-Deposition of Nanostructured Ni-Al2O3 Composite Coatings
p.244

Cerium-Phytic Acid Passivation Treatment on Galvanized Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to improve corrosion resistance of galvanized steel, a novel cerium-phytic acid passivation treatment was studied. The process of cerium-phytic acid passivation on galvanized steel was optimized. The corrosion resistance of cerium-phytic passivated samples was tested by dropping test and weight loss test. The electrochemical behaviors of cerium, phytic acid and cerium-phytic acid passivated samples in 0.5 mol/L NaCl solution were investigated by polarization curve and AC impendence spectroscopy, respectively. The corrosion equivalent circuit established according to impedance characteristics. The corrosion current density of the samples were treated by cerium and phytic acid was 8.52 × 10-5 A/cm2 and 9.39 × 10-5 A/cm2, respectively, However, the samples were passivated by cerium-phytic acid the corrosion current density decreased to 1.76 × 10-5 A/cm2, respectively. The test results showed that cerium-phytic acid passivated samples exhibited better corrosion resistance than that of cerium or phytic acid passivated sample under the same test conditions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Surface Engineering View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 373-374)

Pages:

228-231

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.373-374.228

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2008

Authors:

G.M. Liu, L. Yang, F. Yu, Ji Hong Tian, Shu Wang Duo, N. Du

Keywords:

Cerium, Corrosion, Galvanized Steel, Passivation, Phytic Acid

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2008 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] O. Lunder, J.C. Walmsley, P. Mack, K. Nisancioglu: Corrosion Science vol. 47 (2005), p.1604.

Google Scholar

[2] D.H. Wang, X. Tang: Corrosion Science vol. 4 (2005): 2158.

Google Scholar

[3] Ulf Bexell, T.M. Grehk: Surface & Coatings Technology vol. 201 (2007), p.4734.

Google Scholar

[4] F. Deflorian, S. Rossi, L. Fedrizzi: Progress in Organic Coatings vol. 52 (2005), p.271.

Google Scholar

[5] K. Aramaki: Corrosion Science. vol. 48 (2006), p.766.

Google Scholar

[6] L. Roman, M. Blidariu, C. Cristescu: Trans IMF, vol. 75 (1997), p.324.

Google Scholar

[7] Q. Luo, D. J. Andrade: Journal of Chromatography B. vol. 741 (2000), p.23.

Google Scholar

[8] H. Liang, Y. Chen: Corrosion & protection in petrochemistry industry. vol. 21(2004), p.5.

Google Scholar

[9] H. Wu, J. Chen, J. Lu: Material protection. vol. 37(2004), p.45.

Google Scholar

[10] G.N. Mu, G.H. Liu: Corrosion & protection. vol. 23 (2002), p.51.

Google Scholar

[11] A. Philip, P.E. Schweitzer: Corrosion technology, p.287. Marcel Deker, Inc, (2003).

Google Scholar