Influence of Surface Defect Geometry on the Localization and Failure of AA6111 Sheet: Necking versus Shear

Article Preview

Abstract:

The influence of surface defect geometry on the localization and failure behaviour of AA6111 sheet has been investigated through experimentation and numerical modelling. A series of uniaxial tensile samples were produced with idealized top and bottom surface defects (i.e. grooves), located either symmetrically or asymmetrically on the opposing surfaces. The symmetric arrangement corresponds to the “groove-like” initial imperfection of the classical Marciniak- Kuczyński (M-K) model. Experimental results indicate that both the symmetry of the defects and their wavelength have a profound effect on the resulting mode of localization and failure as well as on the limit strains. Specifically, symmetric surface defects are seen to induce localization and failure through simple necking, whereas asymmetric defects tend to promote macroscopic, throughthickness shearing. Furthermore, asymmetric surface defect geometries are found to produce lower limit strains in the AA6111 sheet under study for defect wavelengths below about 1.5 mm, while the reverse is true when defect wavelengths are above 1.5 mm. Finite element method (FEM) modelling simulations are also presented, demonstrating that the experimentally-observed trends in localization and failure behaviour can be replicated using a mixed isotropic-kinematic hardening implementation of the Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman (GTN) material model.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 519-521)

Pages:

131-138

Citation:

Online since:

July 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Z. Marciniak and K. Kuczyński: Int. J. Mech. Sci. Vol. 9 (1967), p.609.

Google Scholar

[2] D.J. Lloyd D.J. and D. Kenny: Met. Trans. A Vol. 13 (1982), p.1445.

Google Scholar

[3] V. Tvergaard: J. Mech. Phys. Solids Vol. 35 (1987), p.43.

Google Scholar

[4] W.B. Lievers, A. K. Pilkey and M. J. Worswick: Mech. Mat. Vol. 35 (2003), p.661.

Google Scholar

[5] E. Voce: J. Inst. Met. Vol. 74 (1948), p.537.

Google Scholar

[6] ISO 12085: Geometrical Products Specifications (GPS) Surface Texture: Profile Method Motif Parameters (International Standards Organization, Switzerland 1996).

DOI: 10.3403/02337030

Google Scholar

[7] W.B. Lievers, A.K. Pilkey and D.J. Lloyd: Mat. Sci. Eng. A Vol. A361 (2003), p.312.

Google Scholar

[8] W.B. Lievers, A.K. Pilkey and D.J. Lloyd: Acta Mat. Vol. 52 (2004), p.3001.

Google Scholar

[9] G.J. Baczynski, R. Guzzo, M.D. Ball and D.J. Lloyd: Acta Mat. Vol. 48 (2000), p.3361.

Google Scholar

[10] P.D. Wu, D.J. Lloyd, A. Bosland, H. Jin and S.R. MacEwen: Acta Mat. Vol. 51 (2003), p. (1945).

Google Scholar