Influence of an Inclined Cooling Plate on the Production of A356/CNF and A356/SiC MMC by Compocasting

Article Preview

Abstract:

The influence of an inclined cooling plate utilized as a modification in the compocasting process of aluminum alloy is studied in this paper. Based on the crystal separation theory, molten A356 is poured on the inclined copper plate in order to produce solidification nuclei inside the fluid metal, which is, then, mechanically stirred while reinforcement is added through its surface. Carbon nano fibers (CNF) and particulate SiC were utilized as reinforcement, in quantities varying from 0.5 to 15vol%. Dispersion of the reinforcements was observed by macro and microstructure analysis. For CNF, addition of quantities up to 1vol% resulted in homogeneous dispersion through the matrix, although SEM analysis showed the presence of clusters of up to 50μm in some points of the samples. SiC was properly mixed into matrix until 10vol%. Globular crystals were obtained, but some coarsening occurred, especially for small quantities of reinforcement. Utilization of the inclined cooling plate produced good inclusion and homogenization for two different reinforcements through an A356 matrix. The best results were obtained for a 180mm cooling plate, with inclination of 60o. The pouring temperature utilized was 10oC over the melting point of the alloy, and temperature of the tundish was kept around 598oC during stirring.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 519-521)

Pages:

609-614

Citation:

Online since:

July 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] G. A. Rozak, Effects of Processing on the Properties of Aluminum and Magnesium Matrix Composites (UMI, Ohio, 1993).

Google Scholar

[2] A. Sato, R. Mehrabian, Metallurgical Transactions B. Vol. 7B, 443-451, (1976).

Google Scholar

[3] J.U. Ejiofor, R.G. Reddy, JOM. Vol. 49 (11) (1997), pp.31-37.

Google Scholar

[4] R. Andrews, D. Jacques, A.M. Rao et al., Applied Physics Letters. Vol. 75, Issue 9, pp.1329-1331, (1999).

Google Scholar

[5] A. Ibrahim, F.A. Mohamed, E.J. Lavernia, Journal of Material Sciences, Vol. 26, 1137-1156, (1991).

Google Scholar

[6] J. W. McCoy, C. Jones, and F. E. Wawner, SAMPE Quart. Vol. 19 (2), 37-50, (1988).

Google Scholar

[7] R. Mehrabian, R. G. Riek, and M. C. Flemings, Metallurgical Transactions. Vol. 5, p.1899, (1974).

Google Scholar

[8] E. F. Fascetta, R. G. Riek, R. Mehrabian, and M. C. Flemings, Transactions AFS. Vol. 81, p.81, (1973).

Google Scholar

[9] V. Laurent, P. Jarry, G. Regazzoni, and D. Apelian, Journal of Material Sciences, Vol. 27, 4447-4459, (1992).

Google Scholar

[10] F. Moll and K. U. Kainer in Magnesium Alloys and Technology: Particle-Reinforced Magnesium Alloys, K. U. Kainer eds. (Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim, 2003).

DOI: 10.1002/3527602046.ch12

Google Scholar

[11] A. Ohno, T. Motegi, and H. Soda, Iron and Steel Institute of Japan. 18-23 (1971).

Google Scholar

[12] E. Yano, N. Wada, N. Nishikawa, and T. Motegi, J. Japan Institute of Metals, Vol. 66, 1131-1134, (2002).

Google Scholar

[13] R.G.S. Mussi, T. Motegi, F. Tanabe et al., in Proceedings: Material Processing for Properties and Performance. Vol. 4, 211-215, (2005).

Google Scholar

[14] K. Moon, PhD Thesis, Dept. Material Science and Eng., MIT, (1990).

Google Scholar