Development of Smart Stress Memory Sensor Using AE Kaiser Effect

Article Preview

Abstract:

Reliability of structures is an important task to ensure the ease and safety of our life, and further development of non-destructive evaluation for structures such as bridges and tunnels is required. Some fatigue sensors that consist of sacrificed specimen have been developed to evaluate the fatigue damage of structures such as fatigue cyclic number and residual lifetime. However, these fatigue sensors can be used only when the applied stress amplitude is known. We tried to develop a new smart stress memory patch that measured both maximum stress and number of fatigue cycles simultaneously using Kaiser effect of Acoustic Emission (AE) and crack length. In this study, the characteristics of the smart patch was evaluated. Pure copper was used for this sensor because its good corrosion resistance, stable crack propagation and detectability of AE near yield point. Fatigue test was performed under the constant stress amplitude to evaluate the crack propagation behavior using the relationship between stress intensity factor and crack propagation rate. The obtained curve between crack length and number of fatigue cycles by these crack propagation behavior was in good agreement with experimental results. AE measurement after some fatigue tests was performed and AE was detected at the applied fatigue stress. These results demonstrated that number of fatigue cycles and the maximum stress could be measured by this fatigue sensor.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 321-323)

Pages:

244-247

Citation:

Online since:

October 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. F. Masri, L. H. Sheng, J. P. Caffrey, R. L. Nigbor, M. Wahbeh and A. M. Abdel-Ghaffar: Smart Mater. Struct. 13 (2004), p.1269.

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/13/6/001

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Fujimoto, G. Pirker, H. Ito, E. Shintaku and S. Shono: Ship Tech. Res. Vol. 49 (2002), p.33.

Google Scholar

[3] T. Kobayashi, O. Muragishi and K. Nihei: Key Engineering Materials 261-263 (2004), p.1313.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.261-263.1313

Google Scholar

[4] A. Hadrboletz, B. Weiss and G. Khatibi: Int. J. Fract. 107 (2001), p.307.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Kotousov and C. H. Wang: Int. J. Fract. 111 (2001), p. L53.

Google Scholar

[10] [20] [30] [40] [50] 0. 02 0. 03 0. 04 0. 05.

Google Scholar

500 1000 1500 Stress Amplitude Time, t / s Stress, σ/ MPa Amplitude / V.

Google Scholar

[10] [20] [30] [40] [50] 0. 02 0. 03 0. 04 0. 05.

Google Scholar

500 1000 1500 Stress Amplitude Stress Amplitude Time, t / s Stress, σ/ MPa Amplitude / V Fig. 5 AE behavior under the condition of σmax=30MPa and α=0. 6.

Google Scholar

[10] [15] [20] [25] [30] [35] [40] [45] [50] [10] 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 σmax / MPa σAE / MPa σAE (a=3mm) σmax σAE (a=3. 5mm) σAE (a=4mm).

Google Scholar

[10] [15] [20] [25] [30] [35] [40] [45] [50] [10] 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 σmax / MPa σAE / MPa σAE (a=3mm) σmax σAE (a=3. 5mm) σAE (a=4mm).

Google Scholar

[10] [15] [20] [25] [30] [35] [40] [45] [50] [10] 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 σmax / MPa σAE / MPa σAE (a=3mm) σmax σAE (a=3. 5mm) σAE (a=4mm) Fig. 6 The relationship between the fatigue maximum stress and AE generation stress.

DOI: 10.31857/s0002-333720192137-155-8568

Google Scholar