Numerical Simulation of 3-D Fracture Behaviors on the FRP-Strengthened Concrete Structures

Article Preview

Abstract:

A numerical code RFPA3D (Realistic Failure Process Analysis) is used to simulate the crack initiation and propagation in FRP-strengthened concrete beam under external loading. In our model, the FRP-strengthened concrete is assumed to be a three-phase composite composed of concrete, FRP, and interface between them. The displacement-controlled loading scheme is used to simulate the complete failure process of FRP-strengthened concrete the numerical simulation of failure process of the specimens. It is found that the main failure mode is the interfacial debonding and the interfacial debonding may propagate either within the adhesive layer or through concrete layer in the vicinity of bond interface. The simulation results agree well with the experiment observations. The width of the FRP sheet is considered an important factor not only to significantly influence the debonding propagation type and crack distribution but also to control the ultimate load-capacity and ultimate strain. This study is focused on the failure process of the FRP-strengthened concrete beam and the effects of the width of FRP sheet on the failure mode and on the structural load-carrying capacity of concrete structures.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 324-325)

Pages:

423-426

Citation:

Online since:

November 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y L Mo, S P Tsai and I S Lee. J Mater Struct, 31(1998), P. 411.

Google Scholar

[2] F Seible, M J N Priestley, G A Hegemier and K. J Innamorato. Comp constr 2(1997),P. 52.

Google Scholar

[3] H Varastehpour and P Hamelin. J Mater Struct, 30(1997), P. 160.

Google Scholar

[4] A M Malek, H Saadatmanesh and M R Ehsani. ACI Struct J, 95(1998), P. 142.

Google Scholar

[5] Z S Wu and Y Jun. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 70 (2003), P. 1339.

Google Scholar

[6] KT Lau, L M Zhou. J Comp Part B 32(2001), P. 21.

Google Scholar

[7] VPV Ramana, t Kant, S E Morton, P K Dutta, A Mukherjee and Y M Desai. J Comp Part B 31(2000), P. 461.

Google Scholar

[8] H Yuan and Z S Wu and H Yoshizawa. J Struct Mech Earthquake Eng JSCE, 4 (2001),P. 27.

Google Scholar

[9] H Nishida, A Kamiharako , T Shimomura and K Maruyama. Proc JCI, 213(1999), P. 1507.

Google Scholar

[10] C. A Tang and W.C. Zhu: Concrete Damage and Rupture-Numerical Testing. (Beijing: Science press, China, 2003).

Google Scholar

[11] Z Z Liang, C A Tang, H X Li and Y B Zhang. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 41 (2004),P. 419.

Google Scholar

[12] W.C. Zhu, S.H. Wang and C.A. Tang, Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 243-244(2003), p.279.

Google Scholar

[13] J X Zhang, J J Liu, C A Tang and X Chang. Key Engineering Materials, 297-300(2005), P. 2654. 0 0. 2 0. 4 0. 6 0. 8 1 1. 2 0 0. 5 1 1. 5 2 2. 5 Displacement(mm) N/Ncr FRP-w-20 FRP-w-60 FRP-w-100 plain concrete experiment.

Google Scholar

[5] Fig. 4 (b) Load displacement compare curves for the experiment and numerical simulation with RFPA 3D Fig. 4 (a) Load-displacement compare curves simulated with RFPA 3D 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 0. 5 1 1. 5 2 Displacement(mm) Load(KN) FRP-w-20 FRP-w-60 FRP-w-100 plain concrete.

Google Scholar