Modelling of the Deburring Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

Due to robotic deburring development, the research gains a new orientation and focused on the cutting forces and the chip control. The present paper will emphasize the main difference which occurs between the normal cutting process and the deburring process, the way it develops and the parameters which characterize this process. Also the dynamics of the process are considered. Based on a central composite design one determine a relation between the geometry of the tool, workpiece hardness and cutting force.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

367-374

Citation:

Online since:

October 2006

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S.R. Brooks, M.D. Campbell and. D.R. Miller: Rotary slotting , Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 40 (1994), Issues 3-4 , 375-383.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(94)90462-6

Google Scholar

[2] C. Dumitras and S. Markos: New Concepts in File's Design and Manufacturing Technology, Proceedings of DAAAM Symposium , 75-76, ISBN 3-901509-04-6, Dubrovnik, Croatia, Oct. 1997, (1997).

Google Scholar

[3] Gillespie La Roux, Deburring and Edge Finishing Handbook, Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Published: Sep 01, 400 pp., (1999).

Google Scholar

[4] Gillespie La Roux, Hand Deburring Increasing Shop Productivity, Published: Nov 01, 486 pp., 2002, ISBN: 0872636429.

Google Scholar

[5] R. Hollwell and R. Guile: An Analysis of Robotic Chamfering and Deburring, Modeling and Control of Robotic Manipulators and Manufacturing Process, DSCD, Vol. 6 (1987), ed. R. Shoureshi, K. Zoucef-Tuomi, ASME, New York, 65-72.

Google Scholar

[6] M.K. Iqbal, et. al: Effect of modified Hedström files on instrumentation area produced by ProFile® instruments in oval canals, Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, Vol. 98 (2004), 493-498.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.03.007

Google Scholar

[7] K.L. Johnson: Contacts Mechanics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, (1985).

Google Scholar

[8] N. Popinceanu: Probleme fundamentale ale contactului cu rostogolire, Publisher: Ed. Tehnică, Bucureşti, Romania, (1985).

Google Scholar

[9] J.M. Schimmels: Multidirectional compliance and constraint for improved robotic deburring. Part 1: improved positioning , Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 17 (2001), August, 277-286.

DOI: 10.1016/s0736-5845(00)00059-4

Google Scholar

[10] B. Snaith, S. Hayward and A. Draper: Variation of Surface Topography Produced Via a Deburring Process, Int. Journal Mach. Tools Manuf., Vol. 35 (1995), 353-356.

DOI: 10.1016/0890-6955(94)p2394-u

Google Scholar

[11] T.M. Stepien, L.M. Sweet and M.C. Good: Control of Tool/Workpiece Contact Force with Application to Robotic Deburring, Proc. 1985 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, IEEE, St. Louis, USA, (1985).

DOI: 10.1109/robot.1985.1087272

Google Scholar

[12] G. Yared: In Vitro Study of the Torsional Properties of New and Used ProFile Nickel Titanium Rotary Files, Journal of Endodontics Volume 30, Issue 6 , June, pp.410-412, (2004).

DOI: 10.1097/00004770-200406000-00008

Google Scholar