Temperature Dependence of Barkhausen Noise Parameters in Carbon Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

Temperature dependence of different parameters (the position of the inflexion point and the saturation value on the root main square, RMS, values versus exciting field curves) of the Barkhausen noise is measured in structural steel (S 235 JRG1). It is shown that while the position of the inflexion point remained constant, the RMS value at the inflexion point and saturation value increased with the increasing temperature, T. Most interestingly the field required for saturation decreased with decreasing temperature and had a breakpoint at about 200K. Breakpoints at the same temperature on the critical exponents versus temperature functions (i.e. on the β(T) and α(T) curves, where β and α are the exponents of the probability distributions of peak heights and durations, respectively) were also observed. This temperature can be identified as the ductile-brittle transition temperature.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 537-538)

Pages:

371-380

Citation:

Online since:

February 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. G. Barkhausen, Phys Z. 20, 401 (1919).

Google Scholar

[2] G. Posgay, L. Imre, Z. Marek and N. Takacs, 4th Int. Conf. On Bark. Noise and MicMag. Testing (2003).

Google Scholar

[3] N. Takács, G. Posgay, L. Harasztosi and D.L. Beke J. of Mat. Sci. 37 3599 (2002).

DOI: 10.1023/a:1016592704808

Google Scholar

[4] I. Mészáros, Mat. Sci. For. Vols. 473-474 (2005) 231.

Google Scholar

[5] I. Mészáros, Physica B 372, (2006), 181.

Google Scholar

[6] P. J. Cote and L. V. Meisel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1334 (1991).

Google Scholar

[7] D. Spasojevic, S. Bukvic, S. Milosevic and H. E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. E 54, 2531 (1996).

Google Scholar

[8] P. Bak, C. Tang and K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 381 (1987).

Google Scholar

[9] experimental data B. Gutenberg and C. F. Richter Ann. Geophys. 9, 1 (1956) analysis Z. Olami, H J. S. Feder and K. Christensen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1244 (1992).

Google Scholar

[10] E. Vives, J. Ortin, I. Rafols, R. Perez-Magrane and A. Planes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1694 (1994).

Google Scholar

[11] Z. Balogh, L. Daróczi, L. Harasztosi, D.L. Beke, T.A. Lograsso, D.L. Schlagel, Mater. Trans. 47(3), (2006), 631.

Google Scholar

[12] F. Kun, Gy. B. Lenkey, N. Takács and D. L. Beke Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 227204 (2004).

Google Scholar

[13] R. N. Kostoff, M. F. Shlessinger and G. Malpohl, Frac-Comp. Geom. Patt. and Sca. in Nat. and Soc. 12 (1), 1 (2004).

Google Scholar

[14] G. Durin and S. Zapperi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4705 (2000).

Google Scholar

[15] E. Puppin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5415 (2000).

Google Scholar

[16] L. Daróczi, Z. Balogh, Z. Erdélyi and D.L. Beke Acta. Univ. Deb. Phys. Chim. XXXVIIIXXXIX, 91 (2005).

Google Scholar

[17] Z. Balogh, L. Daróczi, Z. Erdélyi, S. Szabó, R. Juhász and D.L. Beke to be puslished Mat. Sci. For. Vol.

Google Scholar