Paper Titles
Dyeing and Finishing Effluent Treatment with Chitosan/Inorganic Composites
p.1069
Metal-PZT Composite Piezoelectric Transducers and Ultrasonic Motors
p.1073
Development of FGM Monomorph Actuator for Impedance Pump Application
p.1077
Active Vibration Control of the Print Circuit Boards Using Piezoelectric Bimorphs
p.1081
The Response Time of a Magnetorheological Fluid Squeeze Film Damper Rotor System
p.1085
Controllability of a Magnetorheological Fluid Squeeze Film Damper under Sinusoidal Magnetic Field
p.1089
Effect of Fatigue Crack Propagation in the Shape Memory Alloy Fiber Reinforced Smart Composite
p.1093
Shear Horizontal Waves in a Piezoelectric-Piezomagnetic Tri-Material
p.1097
Surface Characteristics of Zirconia-Coated TiO2 and its Phase Transformation
p.1101

The Response Time of a Magnetorheological Fluid Squeeze Film Damper Rotor System

Article Preview

Abstract:

The response time of a rotor system on a magnetorheological(MR) fluid squeeze film damper was measured experimentally. The effects of rotating speed, step voltage and rotor imbalance on the response time were dealt with. It is shown that the MR fluid damper rotor system is a second-order dynamic system. The rapid response time defined by the time taken for the vibration amplitude to rise (fall) from 10 % (or 90%) to 90 % (or 10%) of the vibration amplitude difference between the initial and final states is 0.05~0.7s in applying a step voltage and 0.01~1.225s in dropping a step voltage, respectively. It is impossible for the response time to be within a few milliseconds. The response time is determined not only by magnetic field strength, MR fluid specification, rotational speed, but operation mode of the power supply. There is a zero initial delay time at either applying or dropping the step voltage, which is caused by the magnetizing or de-magnetizing process.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Advances in Composite Materials and Structures View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 334-335)

Pages:

1085-1088

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.334-335.1085

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

March 2007

Authors:

Chang Sheng Zhu

Keywords:

Magnetorheological Finishing (MRF), Response Time, Rotor, Squeeze Film Damper, Vibration

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] K. W. Weiss and J. D. Carlson: Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 6(1993), pp.2609-23.

Google Scholar

[2] V. M. Zamudio, et al.: Physica A 227 (1996), pp.55-65.

Google Scholar

[3] J. C. Hill and H. V. Steenkiste. J. Appl. Phys. 70(1991), pp.1207-11.

Google Scholar

[4] D. J. Peel, et al.: Proc. Actuator 90 Congress (Bremen, 1990), pp.144-149.

Google Scholar

[5] R. Navay: Smart Mater. Struct. 6(1997), pp.67-75.

Google Scholar

[6] J. M. Ginder and S. L. Ceccio: J. Rheol. 39(1995), pp.211-34.

Google Scholar

[7] C. Zhu: Chinese J. of Aeronautics 14(2001), pp.6-12.

Google Scholar

[8] F. F. Ehrich: Handbook of Rotordynamics, Krieger Publishing Company, (1999).

Google Scholar