New Process-Microstructure Method for Affordable 2024 Series Aerospace Aluminum Alloys

Article Preview

Abstract:

New affordable 2024 series aerospace aluminum alloy has been developed. Fracture toughness has been demonstrated increase in inverse proportion to the root of the distance between constituents, Cu2FeAl7, formed during ingot solidification. Higher fracture toughness material is obtained by means of combination of reduction of Fe content and wider spacing between the constituents. The fractured surface of those materials has been confirmed to show larger dimples due to the wider constituents. An outcome is the fracture toughness increases 20% through broadening the space from 75 to 140μm. Fatigue crack growth (FCG) has been governed by the morphology of dispersoids such as Cu2MnAl20, Cr2Mg3Al18 and ZrAl3, formed in homogenization process during heat treatment of ingot. In a low ΔK region, the FCG rate is slower when Cu2MnAl20 becomes larger. It is reconfirmed that the FCG rate is still faster for small dispersoids, Cr2Mg3Al18 or ZrAl3 bearing materials than Cu2MnAl20 bearing one through bridging effect of dispersoids. In a high ΔK region, on the other hands, the FCG rate becomes slower by broadening the spacing of the constituents. A new 2024 series alloy (2x24) with high fracture toughness and excellent FCG resistance has been developed on the basis of process- microstructure-structure methods.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 539-543)

Pages:

3643-3648

Citation:

Online since:

March 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.V. Hyatt and S.E. Axter: Science and Engineering of Light Metals (RASELM'91) (Japan Inst. Light Metals, Japan 1991), p.273.

Google Scholar

[2] E. A. Starke, Jr. and J. T. Staley: Prog. Aerospace Sci., Vol. 32(1996), p.131.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Speidel: Proc. of 6th Int. Light Metals Cong. Leoven/Vienna (Australia 1975), p.67.

Google Scholar

[4] D.F. Thompson and S. A. Levy: Symp. on Aluminum Alloy for Aircraft Industry (1985), p.165.

Google Scholar

[5] J. T. Staley: M. E. Fine Sump, ed. by P. K. Liaw et al, Detroit 1990 (TMS, 1991), p.273.

Google Scholar

[6] J. R. Rice and M. A. Johnson: Inelastic Behaviour of Solid, (1970), p.641.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Nakai and T. Eto: J. of Japan Inst. of Light Metals, Vol. 45 (1995), p.677.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Nakai and T. Eto: US. Patent 5759302, 2 Jun. (1998).

Google Scholar

[9] M. Nakai and T. Eto: Mat. Sci. Eng. A., Vol. 285(2000), p.62.

Google Scholar

[10] D. Firrao and R. Roberti: Proc. 113th AIME Conf., ed. by J. M. Wells and J. B. Landers (AIME, 1085), p.165.

Google Scholar

[11] J. T. Staley, W. G. Truckner, R. J. Bucci and A.B. Thackker: Aluminum, Vol. 53, p.667.

Google Scholar

[12] S. Suresh and R. O. Ritchie: Int. Metal Rev., Vol. 29 (1984), p.455.

Google Scholar

[13] T. Kimura, T. Takahashi, T. Ohnishi, T. Eto and M. Nakai: Mitsubishi Juko Giho, Vol. 35 (1998), p.326.

Google Scholar