Paper Titles
A Fundamental Model of Aluminum Single Crystal Behavior with Physical Description of Kinematic Work Hardening
p.577
Modelling the Deformation and Annealing Processes: Physical and Regression Approaches
p.583
Normal Grain Growth in Three Dimensions: Monte Carlo Potts Model Simulation and Mean-Field Theory
p.589
Modelling the Influence of Cementite on Static Recrystallisation in Cold-Rolled Low-Carbon Steels
p.595
Kinetics, Mechanism and Modeling of Microstructural Evolution during Dynamic Recrystallization in a 15Cr-15Ni-2.2Mo-Ti Modified Austenitic Stainless Steel
p.601
Microstructure Evolution during Thermal Processing : Insight from In-Situ Time-Resolved Synchrotron Radiation Experiments
p.607
Properties and Dynamics of Bulk Subgrains Probed In-Situ Using a Novel X-Ray Diffraction Method
p.613
Determination of Texture and Microstructure of Recrystallized Metals Using High-Energy Synchrotron Radiation
p.619
Three Dimensional Microstructure–Microtexture Characterization of Pipeline Steel
p.625

Kinetics, Mechanism and Modeling of Microstructural Evolution during Dynamic Recrystallization in a 15Cr-15Ni-2.2Mo-Ti Modified Austenitic Stainless Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

Kinetics, mechanism and modeling of the microstructural evolution of a 15Cr-15Ni- 2.2Mo-0.3Ti modified austenitic stainless steel (alloy D9) during dynamic recrystallization (DRX) have been investigated. The kinetics of DRX has been investigated employing a modified Johnson- Mehl-Avrami-Kolmogorov (JMAK) model. The microstructural study shows that nucleation of new grains during DRX takes place on the parent grain boundary by a bulging mechanism. No significant texture component has been found to develop in the recrystallized matrix. A substantial amount of twins have been observed in the recrystallized matrix. It is proposed that twins play an important role during the nucleation and subsequent expansion of DRX in alloy D9, which in turn moderates the texture in the recrystallized matrix. An artificial neural network model has also been developed to predict the fraction of DRX and grain size, as a function of processing conditions. A good correlation between experimental findings and predicted results has been obtained.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Fundamentals of Deformation and Annealing View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volume 550)

Pages:

601-606

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.550.601

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2007

Authors:

Sumantra Mandal, P.V. Sivaprasad, R.K. Dube, Baldev Raj

Keywords:

Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Austenitic Stainless Steel, Dynamic Recrystallization (DRX), Kinetic, Mechanism, Modeling

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] S. Venkadesan, P.V. Sivaprasad, C. Narayanan and V. Shanmugam: Proc. Internatl. Conf. on Stainless Steels INCOSS-89, Ind. Inst. Metals, Bombay, Feb. 1989. (Eds. P. Krishna Rao et al. ), Omega Scientific Publishers, New Delhi, (1992) p.345.

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Weiping, R.L. Gall and G. Saindrenan: Mater. Sci. and Engg. A Vol. 332 (2002), p.41.

Google Scholar

[3] M. Wahabi, J.M. Cabrera and J.M. Prado: Mater. Sci. and Engg. A Vol. 343 (2003), p.116.

Google Scholar

[4] P.V. Sivaprasad, S.L. Mannan, Y.V.R.K. Prasad and R.C. Chaturvedi: Mater. Sci. Technol. Vol. 17 (2002), p.545.

Google Scholar

[5] T. Sakai and J.J. Jonas: Acta Metal. Vol. 32 (1984), p.189.

Google Scholar

[6] D. Ponge and G. Gottstein: Acta Mater. Vol. 46 (1998), p.69.

Google Scholar

[7] E. Brunger, X. Wang and G. Gottstein: Scripta Mater. Vol. 38 (1998), p.1843.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Hasegawa, M. Yamamoto and H. Fukutomi: Acta Mater. Vol. 51 (2003), p.3939.

Google Scholar

[9] M. Hasegawa and H. Fukutomi: Mater. Trans. Vol. 43 (2002), p.2243.

Google Scholar

[10] G. Gottstein: Acta Metal. Vol. 32 (1984), p.1117 (b) 10 20 30 40 50 60 0. 00 0. 05 0. 10 0. 15 0. 20 Relative frequency Misorientation angle (0 ) Misorientation distribution plot (a).

Google Scholar