Development of Superplastic Properties in Quasi Single Phase Alloys

Article Preview

Abstract:

The early view of superplasticity was that it was a phenomenon that could only be exhibited by fine grained, two phase alloys. This effectively ruled out most alloys that possessed attractive service properties. The first material to demonstrate good superplastic properties from a virtually single phase microstructure was the Al-6%Cu-0.5%Zr, AA 2004 but this was followed by superplastic versions of AA7475, AA8090 and AA5083. Superplasticity was also demonstrated in magnesium based alloys at an early stage. More recently different grain control additions, such as scandium or erbium have been investigated and it has also been demonstrated that, in certain circumstances, aluminium simply with the addition of a grain controlling element can exhibit good superplastic behaviour. While conventional wisdom teaches that large fabricating strains are required to confer good superplastic properties in the sheet product, recent results with both aluminium and magnesium alloys cast doubt on this belief. Although, for many years, strip casting has appeared to provide an attractive semi-fabricating route for superplastic sheet problems with centre line segregation in alloys with a wide freezing range have precluded its use. It has been demonstrated that recent developments in strip casting enable production of alloys with as wide a freezing range as AA5182 to be cast with a fine, equiaxed grain structure across the strip thickness. The paper will review the state of these various developments and their implications for the manufacture of superplastic sheet materials.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 551-552)

Pages:

357-364

Citation:

Online since:

July 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] E E Underwood: J. Met., 14, (1962), p.914.

Google Scholar

[2] W A Backofen, I R Turner and D H Avery: ASM Trans., 57, (1964), p.980.

Google Scholar

[3] R Grimes, C Baker, M J Stowell B J Watts: Aluminium, 51, (1975), p.720.

Google Scholar

[4] R Grimes in: AGARD Lecture Series 168, AGARD, Neuilly sur Seine, (1989), p.81.

Google Scholar

[5] J A Wert, N E Paton, C H Hamilton and M W Mahoney: Metall. Trans. A, 12A, (1981), p.1265.

Google Scholar

[6] Won-Wook Park: Materials and Design, 17, (1996), p.85.

Google Scholar

[7] H Henein and L C Marin: Metal Powder Report, 51, (1997), p.38.

Google Scholar

[8] N Tsuji, K Shiotsuki, H Utsunomiya and Y Saito: Mater. Sci. Forum, 304-306, (1999), p.73.

Google Scholar

[9] Q Cui and K Ohori: Materials Science and Technology, 16, (2000), p.1095.

Google Scholar

[10] R Mishra and M W Mahoney: Mater. Sci. Forum, 357-359, (2000), p.507.

Google Scholar

[11] Z Y Ma, R S Mishra, M W Mahoney and R Grimes: Materials Science and Engineering A. 351, (2003) p.148.

Google Scholar

[12] W A Backofen, F J Azzarto, G S Murty, S W Zehr in: Ductility, ASM, Cleveland, (1968), p.279.

Google Scholar

[13] J C Tan and M J Tan: Mat. Sci. and Eng., A339, (2003), p.81.

Google Scholar