Material Superplastic Parameters Evaluation by a Jump Pressure Blow Forming Test

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this work a method, based on bulge tests performed on a blow forming equipment, for evaluating the superplastic material characteristics is proposed. The pressure imposed on the sheet and the height of the dome of the specimen during the test are used as characterizing parameters. Different pressure levels are applied subsequently in the same test and the strain rate sensitivity index is calculated starting with analytical considerations and then with an inverse approach based on a simple finite element numerical model of the test. The change of the slope in the specimen dome height curve, due to the change of the pressure, is correlated to the strain rate in the sheet. The method has been verified applying other load profiles on the sheet and good agreement has been found between experiments and numerical results obtained by the inverse analysis.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

119-126

Citation:

Online since:

July 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] N. Chandra, Constitutive behavior of superplastic materials, International Journal of NonLinear Mechanics 37 (2002) 461-484.

Google Scholar

[2] D. Sorgente, L. Tricarico, Analysis of Different Specimen Geometries for Tensile Tests in Superplastic Conditions for an Aluminium Alloy, 9th International Conference on Superplasticity in Advanced Materials (2006).

Google Scholar

[3] A.W. El-Morsy, K.I. Manabe: FE simulation of rectangular box forming using material characteristics from the multi-dome test, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 125-126 (2002) 772-777.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(02)00389-8

Google Scholar

[4] L. Carrino, G. Giuliano, W. Polini, A method to characterise superplastic materials in comparison with alternative methods, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 138 (2003) 417-422.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(03)00110-9

Google Scholar

[5] F. Jovane, An approximate analysis of the superplastic forming of a thin circular diaphragm: theory and experiments, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 10 (1968) 403-427.

DOI: 10.1016/0020-7403(68)90005-2

Google Scholar

[6] J.H. Cheng, The determination of material parameters from superplastic inflation tests, Journal of Materials processing Technology 58 (1996) 233-246.

DOI: 10.1016/0924-0136(95)02128-0

Google Scholar

[7] G. Palumbo, D. Sorgente, L. Tricarico, S.H. Zhang, W.T. Zheng, L.X. Zhou, L.M. Ren, Numerical-Experimental characterization of a superplastic AZ31 magnesium alloy, 9th International Conference on Superplasticity in Advanced Materials (2006).

Google Scholar

[8] D. Sorgente, L. Tricarico, Characterizing a superplastic AA5083 alloy by the blow forming technique and numerical finite element analysis, Proceedings of CAM3S Conference (2005) 888-894.

Google Scholar

[9] N. Ridley, P.S. Bate, B. Zhang: Material modelling data for superplastic forming optimization, Materials Science and Engineering A 410-411 (2005) 100-104.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2005.08.108

Google Scholar

[10] W.J. Kim, S.W. Chung, C.S. Chung and D. Kum: Superplasticity in Thin Magnesium Alloy Sheets and Deformation Mechanism Maps for Magnesium Alloys at Elevated Temperatures, Acta Materialia. 49 (2001) 3337-3345.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(01)00008-8

Google Scholar

[11] D.L. Yin, K.F. Zhang, G.F. Wang, W.B. Han: Superplasticity and cavitation in AZ31 Mg alloy at elevated temperatures, Materials Letters 59 (2005) 1714- 1718.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2005.01.053

Google Scholar

[12] G.R. Liu, X. Han, Computational inverse techniques in nondestructive evaluation, CRC Press (2003).

Google Scholar