Effect of Chemical Etching on Adhesively Bonded Aluminum AA6082

Article Preview

Abstract:

The efforts of new automotive industry are mainly directed towards the substitution of aluminum for steel in the body structure because the aluminum structures are lighter than traditional steel ones and meet the requirements, in terms of both vehicle design and manufacture. However, this substitution is not so automatic, but it is important to study the material properties and the structure design, focusing the attention on the methods of joining. Welding, typical technique to joint steel parts, is particularly difficult when applied on aluminum ones and then, in many cases, the adhesive bonding is preferred. To optimise the joint performances it is necessary to pre-treat the metal surface, not only to remove contaminants, but also to provide the intimate contact needed for the adhesive to successfully bond with the adherent surface. The mere cleaning of aluminum surfaces is not suitable for their bonding due to the oxide layer that naturally occurs on exposure to air so we need to apply a more effective treatment (mechanical or chemical etching) to increase the adhesion capability of the substrates. In this work different adhesive joint configurations (single lap) between aluminum substrates are studied. Two different resins are employed to evaluate the influence of the adhesive on the joint performances. Moreover the aluminum sheets are treated with a chemical etching with two different procedures.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

669-676

Citation:

Online since:

July 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Birch: Automotive Engineering 102 (1994), p.8.

Google Scholar

[2] M.W. Rushfort, P. Bowen, E. McAlpine, X. Zhou, G.E. Thompson: Journal of Materials Processing and Technology. In press.

Google Scholar

[3] T.A. Bames, I.R. Pashby: Journal of Materials Processing and Technology 99 (2000), pp.72-79.

Google Scholar

[4] M.J. Wheeler, P.G. Sheasby, D. Kewley: Proc: SAE Technical Paper (1987).

Google Scholar

[5] E.F.M. Winter, M.L. Sharp, G.E. Nordmark, V.F. Banthi: Proc: SAE Technical Paper (1990).

Google Scholar

[6] Aluminum extruders Association: The Aluminum Car (1995).

Google Scholar

[7] L.M. Gourd: Fundamentals of Welding - Principles of Welding Technology (Arnold, Paris 1995).

Google Scholar

[8] K.J. Shroeder: Proc: International Conference on Body Engineering, Body Assembly and Manufacturing (1994).

Google Scholar

[9] L. Dinnie: Vehicle Engineering and Design 235 (1995); pp.17-18.

Google Scholar

[10] G.S. Vasilash : Automotive Manufacturing and Production 109 (1997).

Google Scholar

[11] Y. Komatsu, T. Ari, H. Abe, M. Sato, Y. Nakazawa: Proc: SAE Technical Paper (1991).

Google Scholar

[12] C.S. Adderley: Materials and Design 9 (1988), pp.287-293.

Google Scholar

[13] G. McGrath: Bulletin 3 32 (1991), pp.64-67.

Google Scholar

[14] S. Kalpakjian: Manufacturing Engineering and Technology (Addison - Wesley. New York 1992).

Google Scholar

[15] J.A. Bishopp: Journal of Adhesion 26 (1988), pp.237-263.

Google Scholar

[16] E.M. Petrie: Handbook of Adhesives and Sealants (McGraw-Hill Handbooks, 2000).

Google Scholar

[17] ASTM D2093: Standard Guide for Preparation of Surfaces for Plastics Prior to Adhesive Bonding.

Google Scholar

[18] D.M. Brewis, I. Mathieson: Proc: RAPRA Review Report (2002).

Google Scholar

[19] R.D. Adams, C. Comyn, W.C. Wake: Structural Adhesive Joints in Engineering (Chapman and Hall 1993).

Google Scholar

[20] G. Kelly: Joining of Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastics for Automotive Applications. (Doctoral thesis 2004).

Google Scholar