Improvement of Fatigue Behaviour of High Strength Aluminium Alloys by Fluidized Bed Peening (FBP)

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper deals with a definition of a relatively novel technique to improve the fatigue behavior of high strength aluminum alloys, namely, Fluidized Bed Peening (FBP). Fatigue samples made from AA 6082 T6 alloy were chosen according to ASTM regulation about rotating bending fatigue test and, subsequently, treated by varying FBP operational parameters and fatigue testing conditions. First, a full factorial experimental plan was performed to assess the trend of number of cycles to rupture of fatigue samples varying among several experimental levels the factors peening time and maximum amplitude of alternating stress applied to fatigue samples during rotating bending fatigue tests. Second, design of experiment (DOE) technique was used to analyze the influence of FBP operational parameters on fatigue life of AA 6082 T6 alloy. Finally, ruptures of FB treated samples and untreated samples were discussed in order to evaluate the influence of operational parameters on the effectiveness of FBP process and to understand the leading process mechanisms. At any rate, the fatigue behavior of processed components was found to be significantly improved, thereby proving the suitability of FBP process as alternative mechanical technique to enhance fatigue life of components made from high strength aluminum alloy.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

87-96

Citation:

Online since:

July 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] C. M. Verport, C. Gerdes, Metal Behavior and Surface Engineering, IITT, 1989, p.1.

Google Scholar

[2] B. Syren, H. Wohlfart, E. Macherauch, Arch. Eisenhuttenwes, 48, 1977, p.421 G. R. Leverant, B. S. Langer, A. Yuen, S. N. Hopkins, Met. Trans. A, 10A, 1979, p.251.

Google Scholar

[3] P. Muller, C.V. Verport, G.H. Gessinger, Proc. 1 st Int. Conf. on Shot Peening, Paris, Sept. 1417, 1981, p.479.

Google Scholar

[4] A.A. Mazhar, N. Ahmad, A.Q. Khan, Metal Behavior and Surface Engineering, IITTInternational, 1989, p.193.

Google Scholar

[5] R. Brown, J.W. Edington, Wear, 77, 1982, p.347.

Google Scholar

[6] J. F. Davidson, R. Clift, D. Harrison, Fluidization, Academic Press, (1985).

Google Scholar

[7] M. Barletta, V. Tagliaferri, Int. J. Mach. Tool Manufact., vol. 46, Issue 3-4, 2006, pp.271-283.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Barletta, R. Polini, M. Delogu, Thin Solid Films, Volume 515, Issue 1, pp.87-94.

Google Scholar

[9] T.S. Eriksson, A. Hjortsberg, G. A. Niklasson, and C. G. Granqvist, Applied Optics 20, 1981 CERAC Incorporated, Technical Publications, (2004).

Google Scholar

[10] K-H. Zum Gahr, Tribology International, (1998).

Google Scholar

[11] M. Barletta., G. Costanza, R. Polini, Thin Solid Films, Volume 515, Issue 1, 2006, pp.141-151.

Google Scholar

[12] H. Wohlfart, ICSP 2, May (1984).

Google Scholar

[13] H. E. Franz, A. Olbricht, ICSP 3, October (1987).

Google Scholar

[14] M. Barletta, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 173, Issue 2, 2006, pp.157-165.

Google Scholar

[15] M. Barletta, V. Tagliaferri, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, vol. 46, Issue 3-4, 2006, pp.271-283.

Google Scholar

[16] F. Reidenbach, Finishing Methods, ASM Handbook, Vol. 05, Surface Engineering, ASM International, 10th edition, (1994).

Google Scholar

[17] R. Montanari, A. Sili, G. Costanza, Composites Science and Technology, 61, 2001, p. (2047).

Google Scholar

[18] G. Costanza, R. Montanari and A. Sili, IJMPT vol. 17 nos ¾, 2002, p.214.

Google Scholar

[19] B. Scholtes, Advances in Surface Treatments, 4, 1987, p.59.

Google Scholar