Microstructure Evolution during Tempering of Martensite in a Medium-C Steel

Article Preview

Abstract:

To identify the characteristic microstructural length determining the mechanical properties of a quenched and tempered medium-C steel and its dependence on the prior austenite grain size, different tempering treatments have been carried out after a fully martensitic quenching. The resulting microstructures have been analyzed by Orientation Imaging Microscopy (OIM) and two kind of features have been taken into consideration: packets (i.e. domains delimited by high-angle boundaries) and cells (domains bounded by low-angle grain boundaries). The main results can be summarized as follows: 1. A very weak effect of austenite grain size on packet size was found. 2. A finer packet size was measured at mid-thickness with respect to surface after external and internal water quenching process. This phenomenon was attributed to the effect of the strain path on the phase transformation during quenching. 3. The through-thickness microstructural gradient remains substantially unchanged after tempering. 4. Grains with high-angle boundaries do not significantly grow after tempering; on the contrary, low-angle grain boundaries move, fully justifying the hardness evolution with the tempering temperature.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 558-559)

Pages:

1435-1441

Citation:

Online since:

October 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] D.A. Porter and K.E. Easterling: Phase transformations in metals and alloys, edited by Chapman & Hall, London (1992).

Google Scholar

[2] R.W.K. Honeycombe and H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia: Steels, edited by Edward Arnold, London (1995).

Google Scholar

[3] H.N. Han, C.G. Lee, C.S. Oh, T.H. Lee and S.J. Kim: in AHSSS Proceedings (2004), p.325.

Google Scholar

[4] D.G. McMurtrie and C.L. Magee: Metall. Trans. 1 (1970), p.3185.

Google Scholar

[5] H.C. Shin, S.H. Lee, J.H. Jun and C.D. Choi: Mater. Sci. Technol. 18 (2002), p.429.

Google Scholar

[6] S.A. Khan, H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia: Mater. Sci. Eng. A 129 (1990) p.257.

Google Scholar

[7] S.M.C. van Bohemen, J. Sietsma, M.J.M. Hermans and I.M. Richardson: Acta Materialia 51 (2003), p.4183.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(03)00236-2

Google Scholar

[8] A. Di Schino, E. Anelli, G. Cumino, M. Tivelli and A. Izquierdo: in Proceedings of the SHSS Conference (2005), Paper n° 158.

Google Scholar

[9] P.M. Kelly: Acta Metallurgica 13 (1965) 13, p.365.

Google Scholar

[10] P.M. Kelly: Mat. Trans. 33 (1992), p.235.

Google Scholar

[11] J.N. Petch, Journal of The Iron and Steel Institute (1953), p.174.

Google Scholar