Paper Titles
Comparison of the Biological Behavior of Wollastonite Bioceramics Prepared from Synthetic and Natural Precursors
p.1083
Biological and Biomechanical Behavior of Titanium Implants with Fluoridated Hydroxyapatite Coatings
p.1087
Gene-Expression of MC3T3-E1 Osteoblast Cells Cultured on Anodized Titanium Surface and Machined Titanium Surface by Using cDNA Microarray
p.1091
Comparison of Gene-Expression of MC3T3-E1 Osteoblastic Cell Cultured on Machined Titanium Surface and Resorbable Blast Material Titanium Surface
p.1095
Proliferation of Osteoblast-Like Cells on Zirconia/Alumina Nanocomposite
p.1099
The Experimental Study of Culture of Osteoblast-Like Cells (MG-63) on Nanometer Magnetic Composite Substrate In Vitro
p.1103
Rat Bone Marrow Cell Responses on the Surface of Hydroxyapatite with Different Topography
p.1107
Preliminary Results of In Vitro Study of Cell Growth in a 45S5 Bioactive Glass as Bone Substitute Using Scanning Electron and Confocal Microscopies
p.1111
Initial Attachment of MC3T3-E1 Cells on Nano-HAp Surfaces
p.1115

Proliferation of Osteoblast-Like Cells on Zirconia/Alumina Nanocomposite

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of this study was to evaluate the biocompatibility with the proliferation of osteoblast-like cell (MC3T3-E1) on zirconia/alumina nanocomposite (NANOZR) in comparison to yttria stabilized zirconia (3Y-TZP) and titanium (Ti). Cellular proliferations after 1-, 3-, 6-, and 9-day incubation were calculated from the measurement of the MTT activities of the proliferated cell and were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. Time-dependent proliferation of MC3T3-E1 in all the sample was observed in all three materials with culture days. However, these were no significant differences in the proliferation between three kinds of material, indicating all the materials have a similar-good biocompatibility.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Bioceramics 20 View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 361-363)

Pages:

1099-1102

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.361-363.1099

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2007

Authors:

Daisuke Yamashita, Kenji Kanbara, Miho Machigashira, Motoharu Miyamoto, Hideo Sato, Yuichi Izumi, Seiji Ban

Keywords:

Biocompatibility, Implant, Osteoblast-Like Cell, Zirconia

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2008 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] C. Piconi, and G. Maccauro: Biomaterials Vol. 20 (1999), p.1.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Nawa, S. Nakamoto, and T. Sekino et al Ceramic Intern. Vol. 24 (1998), p.497.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Ban, M. Nawa Y. Suehiro, and H. Nakanishi.: Key Engin. Mater. Vol. 309-311 (2006), p.1219.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Ban, H. Sato, Y. Suehiro, H. Nakanishi, and M. Nawa: Key Engin. Mater. Vol. 330-332 (2007), p.353.

Google Scholar

[5] H. Sato, S. Ban, and M. Nawa: J. J. Dent. Mater. Vol. 25 (2006), p.154.

Google Scholar