In Vitro Dissolution Behavior of Custom Made CaP Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering

Article Preview

Abstract:

The degradation rate of custom made calcium phosphate scaffolds, designed for bone tissue engineering applications, influences the healing process of critical size bone defects. An optimal degradation rate exists at which the neo-formed bone replaces the CaP (calcium phosphate) scaffold [1]. Consequently investigating the complex degradation behavior (dissolution, reprecipitation, osteoclast activity) of custom made CaP structures gains interest. In this work different in vitro dissolution experiments were performed to study the degradation behavior of 4 by composition different calcium phosphates. Ideally these experiments should have a predictive power regarding the in vivo degradation behavior. In vitro dissolution tests still lack standardization. Therefore this study focuses on the influence of two dissolution constraints: (i) the material’s macrostructure (porous - dense), (ii) the regenerated fluid flow (bath shaking - perfusion). From 4 different CaP compositions porous structures and as a reference dense disks were produced, using the same starting powder and heat treatment. To compare the different dissolution tests, all data was normalized to the CaP surface area. Results show that besides the structural appearances of the CaP structures, also the design of the dissolution test influences the in vitro dissolution behavior. Moreover there is a need to take the morphology of the dissolved material into account. The CaP perfusion tests show dissolution dynamics that resemble the in vivo reality more closely than the shaking bath experiments.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 361-363)

Pages:

7-10

Citation:

Online since:

November 2007

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2008 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] X-W Wang (2003), Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 23, 3 pp.159-164.

Google Scholar

[2] M. Mastrogiacomo et al. (2006), Biomaterials, 26, 17, pp.3230-3237.

Google Scholar

[3] T.L. Arinzeh et al. (2005), Biomaterials, 26, 17 pp.3631-3638.

Google Scholar

[4] K.H. Hing et al. (2007), The Spine Journal, In Press, Corrected Proof.

Google Scholar

[5] M. -H.Y. Cheung et al. (2007), Composites Part B: Engineering, 38, 3 pp.291-300.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Yamada et al. (1997) Biomaterials, 18, 15 pp.1037-1041.

Google Scholar

[7] J. Luyten et al. (2003), Advanced Engineering Materials, 5 , 10 pp.715-718.

Google Scholar

[8] T. Van Cleynenbreugel et al. (2006), Med Biol Eng Comput; 44, 7 pp.517-25.

Google Scholar

[9] P. Ducheyne (1993).

Google Scholar