Paper Titles
Improvement of Strength, Weibull Modulus and Damage Tolerance of SiC
p.489
Hydrothermal Synthesis of Bi1.5ZnNb1.5O7 Nanopowders
p.495
Study of the Preparation Technology and Properties of BaBi4Ti4O15 Ceramics
p.499
Edge Effects in Sliding Wear Behavior of ZrO2-WC Composites and WC-Co Cemented Carbides
p.503
Study of Water-Debinding for Ceramic Parts by Injection Molding
p.507
Millimeter-Wave Assisted Sintering of Polycrystalline Yttria for Laser Host Material
p.511
Barium Titanate Nanopowders Prepared from the Modified Oxalate Co-Precipitation Method
p.515
Fabrication of Bi2-xSbxTe3 (x=0-1.5) Thick Film by Centrifugal Deposition
p.519
Synthesis of Ultra-Fine and High-Pure Zirconium Diboride Powders Using Solution-Based Processing
p.523

Study of Water-Debinding for Ceramic Parts by Injection Molding

Article Preview

Abstract:

Water debinding is a new technique for ceramic injection molding. Compared with conventional thermal debinding, water-debinding has many advantages, such as environment friendly, high debinding rate, and suitable for molding large sized ceramic part. In this paper, binder system, based on polyethylene glycol(PEG) and polyvinyl butyryl(PVB), was mixed with 3Y-TZP(ZrO2) powder, and feedstock with 54vol% of ceramic powders was obtained. Shear viscosity of the feedstock was 300Pa·s at 190oC, when shear rate was 100/s, similar to the feedstock based on paraffin wax(PW). SEM showed that the feedstock and sintered parts were both homogeneous. Water debinding dynamics was also studied. For the 5mm x 6mm x 42mm sample, 65% of PEG could be extracted within 2 hours in water at 40oC, and the bending strength of sintered compacts was above 900MPa. The samples with thickness from 9mm to 12mm were made and the green parts could be debinded in water without any defects. The results showed water debinding method could increase the debinding rate and was effective to fabricate large sized ceramic parts.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
PRICM 6 View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 561-565)

Pages:

507-510

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.561-565.507

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2007

Authors:

Zhi Peng Xie, Lin Lin Wang, Xian Feng Yang

Keywords:

Backbone Binder, Ceramic Injection Molding (CIM), Polyethylene Glycol (PEG), Water Debinding

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2007 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] W.W. Yang and K. Y. Yang: Ceram. Int. Vol. 29(2003), p.745.

Google Scholar

[2] M.A. Omar and H.A. Davies: Journal of Materials Processing Technology. Vol. 113(2001), p.477.

Google Scholar

[3] M.J. Edirisinghe and J.R.G. Evans: Br. Ceram. Trans. J. Vol. 86 (1987) p.18.

Google Scholar

[4] R.M. German and A. Bose: Metal Powder Industries Federation. 1997, 32: 14～20, 83～98, 175 ～195.

Google Scholar

[5] M.S. Park: Journal of Materials Science. Vol. 36 (2001), p.5531.

Google Scholar

[6] G. Himpel: Optimization of thermal debinding from injection molded ceramic parts. Ceram. Forum Int. /Ber. DKG. 1997, 74(7/8): 368-371 b 9mm a 9mm.

Google Scholar