Microscopic Examination of the Fracture Surfaces of an H 13 Hot Extrusion Die due to Failure at the Initial Usage Stage

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper studies the fracture surfaces of an aluminium hot extrusion die that broke down during operation. The die was constructed, from H13 steel and was intended for the production of 60,000 Kg of aluminium profile. The male part fractured during operation after the production of 500 Kg profile. Initially, the machine and thermal treatments that were applied for construction of the die were collected and studied. The die was carefully inspected visually with a stereoscope. The fracture surfaces, some cracks, and the structure that was not affected by the failure, were investigated by optical microscopy. The thickness, quality and homogeneity of the nitrated layers were inspected. Additional information concerning the fracture was obtained by examining a primary crack using a scanning electron microscope and chemical analysis of the material was made using EDX attachment. The paper reports on some interesting observations relating to the fractured component, the type of the fractures, and the quality of the heat treatments, and presents some of the probable causes that led to the premature failure of the die.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

177-184

Citation:

Online since:

February 2008

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2008 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P.K. Saha: Fundamental of Extrusion, in Aluminium Extrusion Technology, ASM International , Ed. by American Technical Publisher, Materials Park, Ohio (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] S. L. Semiatin: Conventional hot extrusion, in Forming and Forging, ASM Metals Handbook, Vol. 14, (1998).

Google Scholar

[3] H. Valberg, Int. J. Mater. Product. Techn. Vol. 17, (2002), p.497.

Google Scholar

[4] W.Z. Misiolek, in:J. Mater. Process. Techn, Vol. 60 (1996), p.117.

Google Scholar

[5] M. P. Clode, T. Sheppard: Mater. Sci. Techn., Vol. 6 (1990), p.755.

Google Scholar

[6] S. Abtahi, T. Welo, S. Storen : Proceedings of the Extrusion Technology Seminar (1996), Chicago, IL.

Google Scholar

[7] K. B. Muller: J. Mater. Process. Techn., Vol. 130-131(2002), p.432.

Google Scholar

[8] T. Bjork, R. Westergard, S. Hogmark: Wear, Vol. 249, (2001), p.316.

Google Scholar

[9] K. E. Cooke, S. Yang, C. Seluck, A. Kennedy, D. G . Teer, D. Beale: Surface & Coatings Techn. Vol. 188-289 (2004), p.607.

Google Scholar

[10] M. Tercelj, A. Smolej, P. Fajfar, R. Turk in: Tribology Int., Vol. 40 (2007), p.374.

Google Scholar

[11] A.K. Das, Failure: Types and Characteristics, in Metallurgy of FailureAnalysis, edited by Mc Graw-Hill Companies, New York (1997), p.67.

Google Scholar

[12] D.A. Ryder, General Practice in Failure Analysis, ASM Handbook, Vol. 9, Ed. by Metals Park, Ohio, (1978), p.15.

Google Scholar

[13] W. A. Kortmann, Causes and methods of avoiding failures (Proceedings of the Second Int. Congress of Al), Alumimium2000 (2000), p.219.

Google Scholar

[14] G. C. Moura, M. T. P. Aquilar, A. E. M. Pertence, P. R. Cetlin: Eng. Failure Analysis, Vol. 11, (2004), p.943.

Google Scholar

[15] A. F. M. Arif, A. K. Sheikh, S. Z. Qamarin: J. Mater. Process. Techn. Vol. 134, (2003), p.318.

Google Scholar

[16] F. K. Naufmann, Types of Failures, in Failure Analysis, Case Histories and Methodology, ASM for Metals , Ed. by Metals Park, Ohio, (1983), p.14.

Google Scholar

[17] Uddeholm: Manual Orvar 2 Microliezed, in General Practice in Failure Analysis, Tool Steel Facts, (2000), p.3.

Google Scholar

[18] M. Mousoulis, D. Tseronis, I .F. Sideris, F. A. Fotopoulos, C. Medrea: Proceedings of the 9 th Conference on Material Forming), ESAFORM 2006, (2006), p.503.

Google Scholar