Strength and Fracture of Single Crystal Metal Nanowire

Article Preview

Abstract:

Numerical simulations have been carried out to determine the mechanical property of single crystal copper nanowire subjected to tension using the molecular dynamics method. The mechanism of deformation, strength and fracture are elucidated based on these numerical simulations. No strengthening is found after yielding of the single crystal nanowire. The simulation results show that the strength of copper nanowire is far greater than that of realistic polycrystalline bulk copper. By decreasing the size of the nanowire's cross-section, which leads to an increase of the ratio of surface atoms, the yield stress is increased. The strain rate has an influence on strength, and mechanism of deformation and fracture. When the strain rate is comparatively low, plastic deformation arises from dislocation slips and twins. However, when the strain rate is sufficiently high, amorphization is a dominant factor of plastic deformation and super-plasticity is found. The fracture process is demonstrated using the atomic images.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 261-263)

Pages:

33-38

Citation:

Online since:

April 2004

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2004 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y. Kondo and K. Takayanagi, Physical Review Letters, 79 (1997) p.3455.

Google Scholar

[2] N.I. Kovtyukhova and T.E. Mallouk, Chemistry-A European Journal, 8 (2002) p.4355.

Google Scholar

[3] G Bilalbegovic, Physical Review B, 58 (1998) p.15412.

Google Scholar

[4] S. Tanimori, K. Ishida, O. Sueoka and S. Shimamura, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 68 (1999) p.3556.

Google Scholar

[5] S.Y. Hu, M. Ludwig, P. Kizler and S. Schmauder, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, 6 (1998), p.567.

Google Scholar

[6] H. Mehrez and S. Ciraci, Physical Review B, 56 (1997) p.12632.

Google Scholar

[7] T. Kitamura, K. Yashiro and R. Ohtani, JSME International Journal Series A, 40 (1997) p.430.

Google Scholar

[8] J.W. Kang and H.J. Hwang, Nanotechnology, 12 (2001) p.295.

Google Scholar

[9] E.Z. da Silva, A.J.R. da Silva and A. Fazzio, Physical Review Lettters, 87 (2001) p.256102.

Google Scholar

[10] P.S. Branicio and J.P. Rino, Physical Review B, 62 (2000) p.16950.

Google Scholar

[11] H.A. Wu and A.K. Soh, International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation, 4(2003) p.233.

Google Scholar

[12] R.E. Miller and V.B. Shenoy, Nanotechnology, 11 (2000) p.139.

Google Scholar

[13] H.A. Wu, X.X. Wang, H.Y. Liang and G.Y. Liu, Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 38 (2002) p.903.

Google Scholar

[14] H.A. Wu, X.X. Wang, X.G. Ni and Y. Wang, Acta Metallurgica Sinica, 38 (2002) p.1219.

Google Scholar

[15] M. Doyama and Y. Kogure, Computational Materials Science, 14 (1999) p.80 (a) (b) (c) (d) Fig. 5 Atomic images of fracture process of metal nanowire (a) !=0. 75 (b) !=0. 81 (c) !=0. 84 (d) !=0. 87.

Google Scholar