Micromechanics and Rock Failure Process Analysis

Article Preview

Abstract:

A major challenge in rock mechanics has been the realistic modeling that can reveal the progressive accumulation of damage and shear localization in a brittle rock under compression. The Rock Failure Process Analysis code (RFPA2D) is an efficient tool and realistic model to simulate such complexities. A key assumption of the code is that the heterogeneity of elastic moduli and failure strength are characterized by the Weibull distribution with two parameters (m and σ0 ). However, these two parameters do automatically not relate to the microstructural parameters, such as grain size and microcrack statistics. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to elucidate the micromechanical basis of these Weibull parameters, specifically how they depend on microstructural attributes such as grain size and crack statistics. Secondly, a methodology was developed to quantitatively determine the relevant micromechanical parameters for input into the RFPA2D code. Finally, the methodology was implemented by quantifying the microcrack geometry and statistics of real rock and simulating its uniaxial compression and progressive failure behavior. The simulated result agrees well with the experimental study.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 261-263)

Pages:

39-44

Citation:

Online since:

April 2004

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2004 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M. S. Paterson, Experimental Rock Deformation - The Brittle Field, Spinger-Verlag, New York (1978) p.254.

Google Scholar

[2] J.C. Jaeger, and N.G.W. Cook, Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics, 3rd ed., Chapman and Hall, London, UK (1979) p.593.

Google Scholar

[3] E. Hoek, and E.T. Brown, Underground Excavation Engineering, Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, London (1980).

Google Scholar

[4] J. Handin, J. Geophys. Res., 74 (1969) p.5343.

Google Scholar

[5] C.A. Tang, Y.F. Fu, W.T. Yang, and X.H. Xu, Engineering Geology, 49 (1998) p.207.

Google Scholar

[6] W. Weibull, J. Appl. Mech., 18 (1951) p.293.

Google Scholar

[7] F.A. McClintock, and A.S. Argon, Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA. (1966) p.504.

Google Scholar

[8] A.G. Evans, and T.G. Langdon, Prog. Mat. Sci., 21(1976) p.174.

Google Scholar

[9] C.A. Tang, H. Liu, and P.K.K. Lee, Int J Rock Mech Min Sci., 37 (2000) p.555.

Google Scholar

[10] V. Gupta, and J. Bergström, J Geophys Res, 103 (B10)(1998) p.23975.

Google Scholar

[11] R.H.C. Wong, K.T. Chau, and R. Wang, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 33 (1996) p.479.

Google Scholar

[12] H.P. Xie, and F. Gao, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 37(2000) p.37477.

Google Scholar