Paper Titles
Plastic Limit Load Solutions for Cracks in Steam Generator Tubes
p.1240
Fatigue Properties of Magnesium Alloy under Biaxial Stress
p.1246
Fracture Behavior under Dynamic Biaxial Stress on Magnesium Alloy
p.1254
Evaluation of the Mixed Mode Stress Intensity Factor by Infrared Thermography
p.1262
Determination of Stress Intensity Factor near Crack-Tip of Anisotropic Polycarbonate Plate under Biaxial Loading
p.1270
Ultrasonic NDE of Closed Cracks-Sizing and Evaluation of Crack Opening Stress Intensity Factor under a No Load Condition
p.1277
Quantitative Phase Analysis of the Multi-Phase Alloys Using Neutron Diffraction
p.1285
Very Low Energy Neutron Radiography with Neutron Energy Selection System for Variable Image Contrast
p.1291
Development of CT Imaging System with Very Low Energy Neutrons
p.1297

Determination of Stress Intensity Factor near Crack-Tip of Anisotropic Polycarbonate Plate under Biaxial Loading

Article Preview

Abstract:

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Advances in Nondestructive Evaluation View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 270-273)

Pages:

1270-1276

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.270-273.1270

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

August 2004

Authors:

Akira Shimamoto, Hidenori Osako, Taku Shimomura

Keywords:

Anisotropy, Biaxial Load, Crack Tip, Stress Analysis, Stress Intensity Factor (SIF)

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2004 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] J. Nam, A. Shimamoto, T. Shimomura and S. Tsukagoshi: ATEM'99, Proceeding Vol. 1, pp.350-355.

Google Scholar

[2] G.R. Irwin: Proc. of SESA, 16-1 (1958), pp.93-96.

Google Scholar

[3] D.G. Smith and C.W. Smith: Eng. Frac. Mech., 4 (1972), pp.357-366.

Google Scholar

[4] J.M. Etherridge and J.W. Dally: Experimental Mechanics, 17 (1977), pp.248-254.

Google Scholar

[5] K. Shimizu, H. Shimada and T. Sasaki: Trans. JSME, Ser. A, 46 - 411, (1980), pp.1196-1202.

Google Scholar

[6] P.S. Theocaris and E. Gdoutos: Trans. ASME, Ser. E, 39 - 1, (1972), p.91.

Google Scholar

[7] P.S. Theocaris and E. Gdoutos: Trans. ASME, Ser. E, 39 - 1, (1972), p.75. 0.

Google Scholar

2.

Google Scholar

4.

Google Scholar

6.

Google Scholar

8 1.

Google Scholar

[1] 2.

Google Scholar

[1] 4.

Google Scholar

[1] 6.

Google Scholar

[1] 8.

Google Scholar

０ ２. ０ ３. ０ ４. ０ ５. ０ ６. ０ ７. ０ ８. ０ KⅠ(Isotropic: Photoelasticity) KⅠ(Isotropic: C austics) KⅠ(Anisotropic: Photoelasticity) KⅠ(Anisotropic: C austics) 0.

Google Scholar

2.

Google Scholar

4.

Google Scholar

6.

Google Scholar

8 1.

Google Scholar

[1] 2.

Google Scholar

[1] 4.

Google Scholar

[1] 6.

Google Scholar

０ ２. ０ ３. ０ ４. ０ ５. ０ ６. ０ ７. ０ ８. ０ KⅠ(Isotropic: Photoelasticity) KⅠ(Isotropic: Caustics) KⅡ(Isotropic: Photoelasticity) KⅡ(Isotropic: Caustics) 0.

Google Scholar

2.

Google Scholar

4.

Google Scholar

6.

Google Scholar

8 1.

Google Scholar

[1] 2.

Google Scholar

[1] 4.

Google Scholar

[1] 6.

Google Scholar

[1] 8.

Google Scholar

０ ２. ０ ３. ０ ４. ０ ５. ０ ６. ０ ７. ０ ８. ０ KⅠ(Anisotropic: Photoelasticity) KⅠ(Anisotropic: C austics) KⅡ(Anisotropic: Photoelasticity) KⅡ(Anisotropic: C austics) Fig. 13. Comparison of stress intensity factors by photoelasticity and caustics method under biaxial loading condition (c) Anisotropic θθθθ=45° (b) Isotropic θθθθ=45° (a) θθθθ=0°.

DOI: 10.1016/0010-4361(78)90187-8

Google Scholar