Paper Titles
Using Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) to Measure Misorientation between ‘Parent’ and ‘Daughter’ Grains. Implications for Recrystallisation and Nucleation
p.573
Microstructural Evolution of Synthetic Forsterite Aggregates Deformed to High Strain
p.579
Recrystallization Microstructures during Creep of MgO Single Crystals
p.585
Texture of High Temperature Superconductor Thick Films Tl-1223 and Tl-2223/LaAlO3 Deposited by Spray Pyrolysis
p.591
Investigation of Subgrain Rotation Recrystallization in Dry Polycrystalline NaCl
p.597
Simulation of Spherulite Growth during Polymer Crystallization by Use of a Cellular Automaton
p.603
A Subgrain Growth Model for Strain-Free Grain Nucleation during Recrystallization
p.611
Modeling of Nucleation Spectra for Primary Recrystallization and Application to Through-Process Texture Modeling
p.617
Modelling Recrystallisation during Thermomechanical Processing Using CAFE
p.623

Investigation of Subgrain Rotation Recrystallization in Dry Polycrystalline NaCl

Article Preview

Abstract:

NaCl is plastically anisotropic and forms a well developed substructure during deformation at 0.3-0.5Tm. EBSD was used to assess subgrain misorientations up to 0.5 true strain in dry NaCl. Equiaxed subgrains were ubiquitous but misorientations along segments of subgrain boundaries differed. Three types of subgrain boundary were identified: boundaries that surrounded equiaxed subgrains, boundaries that partly surrounded mantle subgrains, and extended subgrain boundaries, longer than the equiaxed subgrains. All of these subgrain features were recognised at low strains, <0.15. Misorientations of the majority of equiaxed subgrains were generally <2° at 0.5 strain, although segments could reach higher misorientations along kink-like boundaries. Mantle subgrains along grain boundaries tended to develop higher misorientations than in core subgrains. Long subgrain boundaries reached very high misorientations along segments of their length by 0.5 strain. Small new grains formed at triple points and more rarely within grains. Microstructures in NaCl are similar to those found in aluminium. Therefore, the dominant mechanism of high angle subgrain development at 0.5 strain and at 0.4Tm is probably an orientation splitting mechanism rather than equiaxed subgrain rotation.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Recrystallization and Grain Growth View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 467-470)

Pages:

597-602

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.467-470.597

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2004

Authors:

G.M. Pennock, M.R. Drury, C.J. Spiers

Keywords:

Subgrains, Dynamic Recrystallization (DRX), Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD), NaCl

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2004 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] R. D. Doherty, D. A. Hughes, F. J. Humphreys, J. J. Jonas, D. J. Jensen, M. E. Kassner, W. E. King, T. R. McNelley, H. J. McQueen and A. D. Rollett, Mat. Sci. Engin. A 238, 219 (1997).

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-5093(97)00424-3

Google Scholar

[2] F. J. Humphreys and M. Hatherly, Recrystallization and related annealing phenomena, first ed., Pergamon (1996).

Google Scholar

[3] M. R. Drury and J. L. Urai, 173, 235 (1990).

Google Scholar

[4] M. Stipp, H. Stunitz, R. Heilbronner and S. M. Schmid, J. Struct. Geol. 24, 1861 (2002).

Google Scholar

[5] M. Guillope and J. P. Poirier, J. Geophys. Res 84, 5557 (1979).

Google Scholar

[6] W. Skrotski, Textures of Geological Materials, Göttingen, Germany, 1994, p.167.

Google Scholar

[7] R. C. M. W. Franssen and C. J. Spiers, Deformation Mechanisms, Rheology and Tectonics, Leeds, 1990, p.201.

Google Scholar

[8] G. M. Pennock, M. R. Drury, P. W. Trimby and C. J. Spiers, J. Microc. (2002).

Google Scholar

[9] D. A. Hughes, Q. Liu, D. C. Chrzan and N. Hansen, Acta Mat. 45, 105 (1997).

Google Scholar

[10] D. P. Mika and P. R. Dawson, Acta Mat. 47, 1355 (1998).

Google Scholar

[11] H. J. McQueen and W. Blum, Mat. Sci. Engin A 290, 95 (2000).

Google Scholar

[12] M. R. Barnett and F. Montheillet, Acta Mat 50, 2285 (2002).

Google Scholar

[13] C. J. Peach and C. J. Spiers, Tectonophys 256, 101 (1996).

Google Scholar

[14] J. ter Heege, Relationship between dynamic recrytalliztion, grain size distribution and rheology, Ph. D. thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht, (2002).

Google Scholar

[15] P. J. Hurley and F. J. Humphreys, Acta Mat 51, 1087 (2003).

Google Scholar

[16] L. Delannay, O. V. Mishin, D. J. Jensen and P. Van Houtte, Acta Mat 49, 2441 (2001).

Google Scholar

[17] F. J. Humphreys and M. R. Drury, Aluminium Technology, London, 1986, p.76. 1.

Google Scholar

[18] P. S. Bate, Proc. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 357, 1589 (1999).

Google Scholar

[19] N. Hansen and D. Juul Jensen, Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. Lond 357, 1447 (1999).

Google Scholar

[20] P. W. Trimby, M. R. Drury and C. J. Spiers, J. Struct. Geol 22, 1609 (2000).

Google Scholar

[21] F. Heidelbach, I. Stretton, F. Langenhorst and S. Mackwell, J. Geophys. Res 108, 2154 (2003).

Google Scholar