Effects of Stress Cycles on Surface Magnetic Field

Article Preview

Abstract:

The change of magnetic flux as a function of applied tensive stress has been investigated under geomagnetic field for a cuboid specimen of 0.45% wt C steel. A hole was drilled in the center of the specimen to generate stress concentration and the stress concentration of the specimen was theoretic calculated. The magnetic flux near the surface was measured using a reluctance effect sensor with sensitivity of 5 2 10 Gs − × in directions parallel and perpendicular to tensile direction. To each specimen magnetic field distributions of 9 stress cycles, amplitude form 0kN to 120kN, were measured. The results showed a reversible dependence of this field on tensile after the first few stress cycles. Correlation coefficients of these data also show this trend. During the cycles, domain motion and rotation occurred in response to tensile stress. This change included reversible and irreversible process. After several tensile cycles at same stress amplitude, all irreversible components were overcome and the change of magnetic field became mostly reversible. Comparing with the previous work, the reversible magnetic field versus tensile stress shows clearer and more valuable relationship between stress and field.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 490-491)

Pages:

317-321

Citation:

Online since:

July 2005

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] G.F. dionne, IEEE-Abs. Intermagnetic Congress, (April 15, 1969), P. 27.

Google Scholar

[2] Richard. Langman, IEEE Trans. Magn. Vol. 21(1985), P. 1314.

Google Scholar

[3] C.S. Schneider, P.Y. Cannell and K.T. Watts, IEEE Trans. Magn. Vol. 28(1992), P. 2626.

Google Scholar

[4] M. J. Sablik, L. A. Riley, G. L. Burkhardt, H. Kwun, P.Y. Cannell, K.T. Watts, R.A. Langman, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. Vol. 132 (1994) , P. 131.

DOI: 10.1016/0304-8853(94)90307-7

Google Scholar

[5] Hans Hauser, J. Appl. Phys. Vol. 77(1995), P. 2625.

Google Scholar

[6] M. J. Sablik, IEEE Trans. Magn. Vol. 33(1997), P. 3958.

Google Scholar

[7] Makar J M, Tanner B K, NDT & E International, Vol. 31(1998), P. 117.

Google Scholar

[8] Weihua Mao, David L. Atherton, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. Vol. 214 (2000) P. 69.

Google Scholar

[9] Makar J M, Tanner B K, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. Vol. 222 (2000) P. 291.

Google Scholar

[10] Y. H. Chen and D. C. Jiles, IEEE Trans. Magn. Vol. 37 (2001), P. 3069.

Google Scholar

[11] Weichang Zhong, J. Testing and Evaluation. Vol. 3(1984), P. 25.

Google Scholar

[12] Doubov A A. : Diagnostics of metal and equipment by means of metal magnetic memory [A]. Proceedings of ChSNDT [C]. 7th Conference on NDT and International Research Symposium, Shantou, China, (Oct. 1999), P. 181.

Google Scholar

[13] Ren Jilin, Wu Guanhua, Song Kai, Chinese J of NDT, Vol. 24(2002), P. 29.

Google Scholar

[14] Geng Rongsheng. Chinese J of NDT, Vol. 24(2002), P. 118.

Google Scholar

[15] Lin Junming. North China Electric Power, (2000), P44.

Google Scholar

[16] Li Luming, Huang Songling, Wang Laifu, Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, Vol. 12(2002), P. 388.

Google Scholar

[17] Li Luming, Huang Songling, Wang Xiaofeng, Li Shuangshou Shi Keren. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, Vol. 13(2003), P6.

Google Scholar