Paper Titles
Do Advanced Material Models Contribute to Accuracy in Industrial Sheet Forming Simulations?
p.71
Flexibly Rolled Sheet Metal and Its Use in Sheet Metal Forming
p.81
Tribology in Sheet Metal Forming with Regard to Challenges in Lightweight Construction
p.93
Comparison of Material Behavior and Economic Effects of Cold and High Temperature Forming Technologies Applied to High-Strength Steels
p.101
Manufacturing of High Strength Steel and Aluminum for a Mixed Material Body in White
p.109
Use of Zinc-Alloys for Low Temperature Soldering of Zinc Coated Steels
p.127
Process Characteristics of Laser Brazing Aluminium Alloys
p.135
Joining of Steel-Aluminium Hybrid Structures with Electron Beam on Atmosphere
p.143
Non-Vacuum Electron Beam Welding
p.151

Manufacturing of High Strength Steel and Aluminum for a Mixed Material Body in White

Article Preview

Abstract:

Sophisticated materials like high strength steel or even multi phase steel as well as aluminum require more efforts within the manufacturing process than conventional steel sheets as they have been used in the body in white recently. The manufacturing process itself as well as engineering of the parts, material of the forming tools as well as cold and warm joining technologies must be regarded separately. For forming tools coated steel inserts or sometimes even cooling is essential in terms of high-volume car series production. In mixed material solutions using steel in combination with aluminum, the common used resistance spot welding process does not work any more. To maintain high process stability of cold joining technologies combined with adhesive bonding a new process must have been developed. Other items for weight and cost savings are tailored rolled blanks or sophisticated joining technologies. Regarding the manufacturing costs, a cost effective combination of the mentioned high-sophisticated alloys with conventional material should be achieved. Developing a design concept due to crash, stiffness and driving performance, basic requirements have to be considered. This aims to check the high potential of cost intensive materials wherever high functional benefit is necessary under commercial aspects.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Sheet Metal 2005 View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 6-8)

Pages:

109-126

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.6-8.109

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

May 2005

Authors:

Markus Pfestorf

Keywords:

Aluminum (Al), High Strength Steel (HSS), Multiphase Steel

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] M. Fukushima: Das Projekt MAIDAS - Sicherheit auf hohem Niveau. ATZ 5(2004)106, p.442.

DOI: 10.1007/bf03221628

Google Scholar

[2] H. Adam, B. Osburg: NSB NewSteelBody: New ways forward for lightweighting with steel. AutoTechnology 5/2004, p.50.

DOI: 10.1007/bf03246849

Google Scholar

[3] M. Meiler, M. Pfestorf, M. Geiger, M. Merklein: The Use of Dry Film Lubricants in Aluminum Sheet Metal Forming, to be printed in Wear of Materials 2005 Fig. 22. Alternative manufacturing methods at the example of an aluminum front end.

DOI: 10.1016/s0043-1648(03)00087-5

Google Scholar

[4] B. Engl: Stahl hilft leicht zu bauen. Bänder, Bleche, Rohre, 09(1999), p.30.

Google Scholar

[5] B. Lüdke: Funktionaler Rohkarosserieleichtbau - Von den Anforderungen an die Rohkarosserie zu den Anforderungen an die Rohkarosseriewerkstoffe. VDI-Berichte Nr. 1543, 2000, p.115.

DOI: 10.3139/120.100702

Google Scholar

[6] H. Hunger; R. Kaufmann; H.D. Wilde: Die Karosserie des neuen A6. Der neue A6 - Special eddition of ATZ and MTZ, 03(2004), p.181.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Bloeck; J. Timm: Aluminium-Karosseriebleche der Legierungsfamilie AlMgSi. Aluminium, 70(1994)1/2, p.87.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Pfestorf; H. Hooputra; C. Bassi: Anforderungen an Aluminiumblechwerkstoffe im Spannungsfeld von Funktion und Fertigung. Proceedings of the 6th European Automotive Conference The Process Chain Aluminium Automobile, Technik + Kommunikations Verlags GmbH, Bad Nauheim, 22-23. Juni (2004).

Google Scholar

[9] J. Meinhardt; W. Volk; M. Ganser: Kosten- und Entwicklungszeitreduzierung bei der Karosserieteileherstellung trotz neuer Materialien; Tagungsband zum 24. EFB-Kolloquium, Lösungen für die Verarbeitung moderner Blechwerkstoffe, Fellbach, 23. -24. 3. 2004, p.1.

Google Scholar

[10] E. Schedin; L. Prentzas; D. Hilding: Finite Element Simulation on the TRIP-effect in Austenitic Stainless Steel. SAE International, 2004-01-0885.

DOI: 10.4271/2004-01-0885

Google Scholar

[11] M. Pfestorf; M. Müller: Application of Aluminum in Automotive Structure and Hang on parts. Proceedings of Materials Week, International Congress on Advanced Materials, their Processes and Applications, Munich, 1-4 October (2001).

Google Scholar

[12] M. Pfestorf: Funktionale 3D-Oberflächenkenngrößen in der Umformtechnik. Aus der Reihe: Fertigungstechnik - Erlangen, Feldmann, K.; Geiger, M. (Hrsg. ), Meisenbach, Bamberg (1997).

Google Scholar

[13] T. Neudecker; U. Popp; R. Schiffer; U. Engel: Meßvorschrift zur Bestimmung funktionaler 3DOberflächenkenngrößen für die Blechumformung. UTF Science II/2001, 12-17 (Teil I) und III/2001, S. 34-38 (Teil 2).

Google Scholar

[14] S. Werberger: Mit Leichtigkeit zu ausgewogener Achslast. Der neue BMW 5er - Special eddition of ATZ and MTZ, 08. 2004, p.50.

Google Scholar

[15] B. Dressler; K. Kempinger; K. Lief; H. Truckenbrodt; R. Lein; M. Güllübas; R. Krieger; K. Steinberg: Intelligenter Leichtbau - Das wegweisende Karosseriekonzept des neuen BMW 5ér. Der neue BMW 5er - Sonderausgabe von ATZ und MTZ, 08. 2004, p.38.

Google Scholar