Paper Titles
Influences of Isotropic and Anisotropic Material Properties on Stress Intensity Factors of the Crack Tip under Biaxial Stress
p.1598
Effect of Stress State on Mode II Stable Crack Extension
p.1604
Effect of Mode Mixty on Interfacial Fracture Toughness of Si/Organic Polymer
p.1611
Numerical Approach to Fracture of Glass under Biaxial Stress
p.1617
Behavior of Fatigue Crack around a Hole under Biaxial Loading: Effect of Biaxial Static Load
p.1623
Mechanical Properties of LaB6-ZrB2 Composites
p.1630
Vibration Characteristics of the FIV Test Loop
p.1639
Evaluation of Nuclear Piping Failure Frequency in Korean Pressurized Water Reactors
p.1645
Bottom-Mounted Nozzle Failure Modes of a Nuclear Reactor Pressure Vessel under Severe Accident Conditions
p.1652

Behavior of Fatigue Crack around a Hole under Biaxial Loading: Effect of Biaxial Static Load

Article Preview

Abstract:

Fatigue crack initiation and propagation behavior around a hole subjected to various biaxial fatigue loading modes has been investigated considering the effect of the biaxial static stress. Two different biaxial loading systems, i.e. cyclic tensile loading with static torsional load and cyclic torsional loading with static tensile load, were employed to thin-walled tubular specimens with a circular notch. Variation of the initiaiton and propagation directions of the crack around a hole under these loading ssytems was examined. The initiation directions were observed using replication technique and the crack propagation was measured by two crack gages mounted near the notch. It was found that the biaxial static stress superimposed on the cyclic tensile or torsional loading tests has no influence on the initiation and propagation directions of the cracks around a hole. The fatigue crack initiation and propagation direction under cyclic loading with biaxial static load can be very well explained by the maximum of tangential stress range, Dsqq,max. Furthermore, it was shown that the fatigue crack growth rates under biaixial faigue loading becomes higher with increment of biaxial static load.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Advances in Fracture and Strength View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 297-300)

Pages:

1623-1629

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.297-300.1623

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2005

Authors:

Yong Hak Huh, Philip Park, Dong Jin Kim

Keywords:

Biaxial Static Stress, Crack Initiation, Crack Propagation Direction, Maximum Tangential Stress Range, Thin-Walled Tubular Specimen with a Circular Notch

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2005 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] H.C. Wu and C.C. Yang: J. Engng Mater. Tech. Vol. 109 (1987), p.107.

Google Scholar

[2] D.F. Socie and T.W. Shield: J. Engng Mater. Tech. Vol. 106 (1983), p.227.

Google Scholar

[3] T. Ogata, A. Nitta and Blass: ASTM STP 1191 (1993), p.313.

Google Scholar

[4] J.Y. Berard, D.L. McDowell and S.D. Antolovich: ASTM STP 1191 (1993), p.326.

Google Scholar

[5] W. Zhang, and R. Akid: 1997 Fatigue Fract. Mater. Struct. Vol. 20 (1997), p.167.

Google Scholar

[6] F. Erdogan and G.C. Sih: J. Bas. Engng. ASME Trans. Vol. 85 (1963), p.519.

Google Scholar

[7] G.C. Sih.: Int. J. Fracture Vol. 10 (1974), p.305.

Google Scholar

[8] C. Li: Fatigue Fracture Engng Mater. Structures Vol. 12 (1989), p.59.

Google Scholar

[9] K. Tanaka: Engng Fracture Mech. Vol. 6 (1974), p.493.

Google Scholar

[10] G.C. Sih. and B.M. Bathelemy: Engng Fract. Mech. Vol. 13 (1980), p.439.

Google Scholar

[11] J. Qain and A. Fatemi: Engng. Fract. Mech. Vol. 55 (1996), p.969.

Google Scholar

[12] A.T. Yokobori Jr., Y. Koizumi and T. Isogai: Mechanical Behavior of Materials-VI (1991), p.481.

Google Scholar