Dynamic Fracture Analysis of Aluminum Honeycomb Sandwich Panel

Article Preview

Abstract:

Impact behaviors of Aluminum Honeycombs Sandwich Panel (AHSP) by drop weight test were investigated in this study. Two types of specimens with l/2" and l/4" cell size were tested by two impactors with the weight of 5.25kgf and 11.9kgf respectively. Transient, contact and elastic-plastic analyses were performed by finite element method. Impact behavior of AHSP about impact sites appeared nearly the same in low impact energy, but it was different in high impact energy. Face was the strongest about impact and short-edge was the weakest. The damaged area of AHSP was enlarged with the increase of impactor weight that is corresponding to impact energy. After 3-point bending test, fracture modes of AHSP were analyzed with AE counts, lower face sheet was fractured in the long-edge direction first, and then separation between face sheet and core happened. In the short-edge direction after core wrinkled, lower face sheet was torn, impact behavior by FE analysis were increased localized damage in high velocity because the faster velocity of the impact was, the smaller the stress of core was. Consequently, impactor weight had an effect on widely damaged area, while the impact velocity gave rise to localized damaged area.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 306-308)

Pages:

67-72

Citation:

Online since:

March 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] David M. McGowan and Damodar R. Ambur., Damage Characteristic and Residual Strength of Composite Sandwich Panels Impacted with and without a Compression Loading, Materials Conference and Exhibit and AI AA/ASME/AHS Adaptive atructures Forum - PART 1, pp.713-723, (1998).

DOI: 10.2514/6.1998-1783

Google Scholar

[2] S. Santosa and T. Wierzbicki., Crash behavior of box columns filled with aluminum honeycomb or foam, Computers & Structures, Vol. 68, pp.343-367, (1998).

DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7949(98)00067-4

Google Scholar

[3] T. Y. Reddy, H. M. Wen, S. R. Reid and P. D. Soden., Penetration and Perforation of Composite Sandwich Panels by Hemispherical and Conical Projectiles, Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Vol. 120, pp.186-194, (1998).

DOI: 10.1115/1.2842239

Google Scholar

[4] S. D. Papka, S. Kyriakides and S. Kyriakides., Experiments and Full-Scale Numerical Simulations of In-Plane Crushing of a Honebcomb, Elsevier Science, Vol. 46, pp.2765-2776, (1997).

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(97)00453-9

Google Scholar

[5] M. K. Lim, S. C. Low, L. Jiang and K. M. Liew Dynamic Characteristics of Disbonds in Honeycomb Structures, Engineering Structures, Vol. 17, pp.27-38, (1995).

DOI: 10.1016/0141-0296(95)91038-3

Google Scholar

[6] Beomkeun Kim, Richard M. Christensen., Basic two-dimensional core types for sandwich structures, International Journal of Mechanical Science, Vol. 42, pp.657-679, (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(99)00028-4

Google Scholar

[7] Werner Goldsmith and Jerome L. Sackman., An Experimental Study of Energy Absorption in Impact on Sandwich plates, International Journal of Impact Engineering, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp.241-262, (1992).

DOI: 10.1016/0734-743x(92)90447-2

Google Scholar