The Effect of Initial Microstructure of A356 Alloys on the Mechanical Behavior in the Semisolid State

Article Preview

Abstract:

The quality of semisolid casting largely depends on the formability of the semisolid feedstock. Despite of the semisolid casting process conditions, the initial microstructure of the feedstock plays a significant role in determining the metal formability under the semisolid state. In this study, the effect of initial microstructure of A356 alloy on the mechanical forming response in its semisolid state was investigated. A wide range of the initial microstructures varied from a very coarse dendritic structure to a fine globular structure were produced in A356 alloy using the Controlled Nucleation Method, particularly by controlling pouring temperature during solidification. Cylindrical specimens with 12 mm in diameter and 10 mm in height were compressed to a height reduction of 8 mm at constant strain rates from 1.3910-1 /s to 1.3910-3 /s. Strain rate jump tests were also carried out in order to evaluate the strain rate sensitivity at high fraction solid of 0.9. The materials produced with a low superheat exhibit a fine globular structure. They showed a very low compression stress in the semisolid state compared with the materials poured at high temperatures, which have coarse and dendritic structure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volumes 116-117)

Pages:

449-452

Citation:

Online since:

October 2006

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2006 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] M.C. Flemings: Metallurgical Transaction A Vol. 22A (1991), pp.957-981.

Google Scholar

[2] D. H. Kirkwood: International Materials Reviews, Vol. 39 (1994), pp.173-189.

Google Scholar

[3] H. Wang, C.J. Davidson and D.H. StJohn: Aluminium Transactions, 2000, 2(1), P57-66.

Google Scholar

[4] Z. Fan: International Materials Reviews Vol. 47, No. 2 (2002), pp.49-85.

Google Scholar

[5] Xie Shuisheng and Huang Shenghong: Beijing Press of Metallurgical Industry (1995).

Google Scholar

[6] Zhang Jingxin, Zhang Kui, Xu Jun, et al.: Proc. of the 2nd Inter. Conf. on Semisolid Processing of Alloy and Composites, Tsukuba, Japan, (2002), pp.204-208.

Google Scholar

[7] Li Yuandong, Hao Yuan and Yan Fengyun: Proceedings of 2nd semisolid metal processing technology[C] (2002), pp.35-41.

Google Scholar

[8] S. Ji, Z, Fan and M.J. Bevis: Materials Science and Engineering A Vol. 299 (2001), pp.210-217.

Google Scholar

[9] S. Ji and Z. Fan: Proc. of the 6th Inter. Conf. on Semi-solid Processing of Alloys and Composites. Editors G.L. Chiarmetta-M. Rosso. (2000), pp.723-728.

Google Scholar

[10] H. Wang, C.J. Davidson and D.H. StJohn: Proc. of the 6th Inter. Conf. on Semi-solid Processing of alloys and Composites. Editors G.L. Chiarmetta. M. Rosso (2000), pp.149-154.

Google Scholar

[11] H. Wang , Z.L. Ning , C.J. Davidson and D.H. StJohn: Materials Form Vol. 28 (2004), pp.1316-1321.

Google Scholar

[12] H. Wang, D. H. StJohn and Z. Ning: Proc. of the 8th Inter. Conf. on Semi-solid Processing of Alloys and Composites�Limassol, Cyprus (2004).

Google Scholar

[13] D. Apelian: Proc. of the 7th Inter . Conf. on Semisolid Processing of Alloys and Composites, edited by Yasukata Tsutsui, Manabu Kiuchi, Kiyoshi Ichikawa (2002), pp.25-30.

Google Scholar

[14] Hao Wang, David H. StJohn, Cameron J. Davidson: Aluminum Transactions, Vol. 2, No. 1 (2000), pp.57-66.

Google Scholar

[15] P.K. Seo, S.W. Youn and C.G. Kang: Journal of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 130-131 (2002), pp.551-557.

Google Scholar