Isothermal Martensitic Transformation in a Sensitized SUS304 Stainless Steel under Magnetic Field

Article Preview

Abstract:

We have investigated effect of magnetic field at cryogenic temperature on the stability of austenitic phase in a sensitized SUS304 stainless steel. The sensitization of the steel was made by heat-treatment in vacuum at 973 K for 100h after the solution treatment at 1323 K for 0.5 h. Isothermal holding of the sensitized specimens was made under a static magnetic field of 5 T in the temperature range between 60 and 260 K for various holding times. As a result, the TTT diagram under the magnetic field corresponding to the formation of 0.5 vol. % of -martensite shows a double-C curve with two noses. We found that by the application of magnetic field, the nose temperature and the incubation time of upper part of the C-curve, that is due to the    transformation, become lower and shorter, respectively. On the other hand, the nose temperature of lower part of the C-curve, that is due to the      transformation, does not change under the magnetic field although the incubation time shortens by the application of magnetic field.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Materials Science Forum (Volumes 654-656)

Pages:

130-133

Citation:

Online since:

June 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2010 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] S. Murase, S. Kobatake, M. Tanaka, I. Tashiro, O. Horigami, H. Ogiwara, K. Shibata, K. Nagai and K. Ishikawa: Fusion. Eng. Des. Vol. 20 (1993), p.451.

DOI: 10.1016/0920-3796(93)90078-v

Google Scholar

[2] J. W. Chan, D. Chu, A. J. Sunwoo and J. W. Morris, Jr.: Adv. Cryog. Eng. Vol. 38 (1992), p.55.

Google Scholar

[3] D. C. Larbalestier and H. W. King: Cryogenics Vol. 13 (1973), p.160.

Google Scholar

[4] D. T. Read and R. P. Reed: Cryogenics Vol. 21 (1981) p.415.

Google Scholar

[5] F. Lecroisey and A. Pineau: Metal. Trans. Vol. 3 (1972) p.387.

Google Scholar

[6] R. E. Schramm and R. P. Reed: Metall. Trans. A Vol. 6A (1975), p.1345.

Google Scholar

[7] H. C. Shin, T. K. Ha and Y. W. Chang: Scr. Mater. Vol. 45 (2001), p.823.

Google Scholar

[8] T. Tanaka, T. Kadota, Y. Kohno and K. Shibata: Adv. Cry. Eng. Vol. 44 (1998), p.1.

Google Scholar

[9] B. Cina: J. Iron Steel Int. Vol. 177 (1954), p.406.

Google Scholar

[10] R. P. Reed: Acta Metall. Vol. 10 (1962), p.865.

Google Scholar

[11] T. Fukuda, T. Kakeshita and K. Kindo: Mater. Sci. Eng. A Vol. 438-440 (2006), p.212.

Google Scholar

[12] J. H. Lee, T. Fukuda, T. Kakeshita and K. Kindo: Metal. Trans. Vol. 48 (2007), p.2833.

Google Scholar

[13] S. M. Bruemmer and L. A. Charlot: Scr. Metall. Vol. 20 (1986), p.1019.

Google Scholar

[14] K. Nakata and I. Masaoka: J. Nucl. Mater. Vol. 150 (1987), p.186.

Google Scholar

[15] E. A. Trillo and L. E. Murr: Acta Mater. Vol. 47 (1999), p.235.

Google Scholar

[16] N. Parvathavarthini and R. K. Dayal: J. Nucl. Mater. Vol. 305 (2002), p.209.

Google Scholar

[17] J. H. Lee, T. Fukuda and T. Kakeshita: Metal. Trans. Vol. 49 (2008), p. (1937).

Google Scholar

[18] J. A. Venables: Philos. Mag. Vol. 7 (1962), p.35.

Google Scholar

[19] J. Crangle and G. C. Hallam: Proc. Roy. Soc. Vol. A272 (1963), p.119.

Google Scholar

[20] T. Kakeshita, K. Shimizu, M. Ono and M. Date: Mater, Trans., JIM Vol. 33 (1992), p.461.

Google Scholar

[21] T. Kakeshita, Y. Sato, T. Saburi, K. Shimizu, Y. Matsuoka and K. Kindo: Mater, Trans., JIM Vol. 40 (1999), p.100.

DOI: 10.2320/matertrans1989.40.100

Google Scholar