Models for Component Commonality in Multistage Production

Article Preview

Abstract:

Use of common parts for different products (commonality) is important methods for managing product variety and preserving competitiveness in the age of mass customization and supply chain competition. In literature, the advantages of inclusion of common components in a product family are well established. Unfortunately, most of the works have been conducted via simulation or conceptual thinking. The mathematical models in the premises are not adequate for production, planning and control in multistage production. This paper focuses on the advancement of venerable manufacturing resources planning models by incorporating the part commonality concept in a multiproduct, multi-period and multistage manufacturing system under a deterministic situation. The models are validated with established MRPII models. The material requirement schedule for the basic MRP II and proposed models are compared. It is really a good matching shown between the two schedules. The later bearing additional information of the location where to be available the parts in a time frame. The effects of commonality on cost, capacity and requirement schedule are discussed based on the outcomes of the mathematical models executed with the available live data.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

258-266

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2012 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Fixson, S.K., Modularity and commonality research: past developments and future opportunities. Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 2007. 15(2): pp.85-111.

DOI: 10.1177/1063293x07078935

Google Scholar

[2] Heese, H.S. and J.M. Swaminathan, 'Product line design with component commonality and cost-reduction effort. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2006. 8(2): pp.206-219.

DOI: 10.1287/msom.1060.0103

Google Scholar

[3] Zhou, L. and R.W. Grubbstrom, Analysis of the effect of commonality in multi-level inventory systems applying MRP theory. International Journal of Production Economics, 2004. 90(2): pp.251-263.

DOI: 10.1016/s0925-5273(03)00208-1

Google Scholar

[4] Mirchandani, P. and A.K. Mishra, Component commonality: models with product-specific service constraints. Production and Operations Management, 2002. 11(2): pp.199-215.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2002.tb00491.x

Google Scholar

[5] Hillier, M.S., The costs and benefits of commonality in assemble-to-order systems with a (Q, r)-policy for component replenishment. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002. 141(3): pp.570-586.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00279-x

Google Scholar

[6] Ma, S.H., W. Wang, and L.M. Liu, Commonality and postponement in multistage assembly systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002. 142(3): pp.523-538.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00314-9

Google Scholar

[7] Wazed, M.A., S. Ahmed, and Y. Nukman, Commonality in manufacturing resources planning - issues and models: a review. European Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2010. 4(2): pp.167-188.

DOI: 10.1504/ejie.2010.031076

Google Scholar

[8] Enns, S.T., MRP performance effects due to lot size and planned lead-time settings. International Journal of Production Research, 2001. 39(3): pp.461-480.

DOI: 10.1080/00207540010002810

Google Scholar

[9] Koh, S.C.L. and S.M. Saad, MRP-controlled manufacturing environment disturbed by uncertainty. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 2003. 19(1-2): pp.157-171.

DOI: 10.1016/s0736-5845(02)00073-x

Google Scholar

[10] Koh, S.C.L. and A. Gunasekaran, A knowledge management approach for managing uncertainty in manufacturing. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 2006. 106(4): pp.439-459.

DOI: 10.1108/02635570610661561

Google Scholar

[11] Koh, S.C.L., MRP-controlled batch-manufacturing environment under uncertainty. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2004. 55: pp.219-232.

DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601710

Google Scholar

[12] Koh, S.C.L., S.M. Saad, and A. Arunachalam, Uncertainty in ERP-Controlled Manufacturing Systems. International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems, 2005. 1(3): pp.17-34.

DOI: 10.4018/jeis.2005070102

Google Scholar

[13] Wazed, M.A., Shamsuddin Ahmed, and Nukman Yusoff, Uncertainty Factors in Real Manufacturing Environment. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences Research, 2009. 3(2): pp.342-351.

Google Scholar

[14] Hillier, M.S., Component commonality in multiple-period, assemble-to-order systems. IIE Transactions, 2000. 32: pp.755-766.

DOI: 10.1080/07408170008967433

Google Scholar

[15] Hillier, M.S., Using commonality as backup safety stock. European Journal of Operational Research, 2002. 136(2): pp.353-365.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(01)00027-3

Google Scholar

[16] Desai, P., et al., Product differentiation and commonality in design: Balancing revenue and cost drivers. Management Science, 2001. 47(1): pp.37-51.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.47.1.37.10672

Google Scholar

[17] Kim, K. and D. Chhajed, Commonality in product design: Cost saving, valuation change and cannibalization. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000. 125(3): pp.602-621.

DOI: 10.1016/s0377-2217(99)00271-4

Google Scholar

[18] Labro, E., The cost effects on component commonality: A literature review through a management-accounting lens. Manufacturing & service Operations Management (M&SOM), 2004. 6(4): pp.358-367.

DOI: 10.1287/msom.1040.0047

Google Scholar

[19] Thonemann, U.W. and M.L. Brandeau, Optimal commonality in component design. Operations Research, 2000. 48(1): pp.1-19.

DOI: 10.1287/opre.48.1.1.12445

Google Scholar

[20] Wazed, M.A., S. Ahmed, and Y. Nukman, Commonality and its Measurement in Manufacturing Resources Planning. Journal of Applied Sciences, 2009. 9(1): pp.69-78.

DOI: 10.3923/jas.2009.69.78

Google Scholar

[21] Wazed, M.A., S. Ahmed, and Y. Nukman, Impacts of quality and processing time uncertainties in multistage production system. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 2010. 5(6): pp.814-825.

Google Scholar