Materials Science & Technology

FULLTEXT SEARCH
NEW: Advanced Search

Contrasts between the Acoustic Emission Signals Generated by Monopole Versus Dipole Sources

Journal Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 13 - 14)
Volume Acoustic Emission Testing
Edited by R. Pullin, K.M. Holford, S.L. Evans and J.M. Dulieu-Barton
Pages 61-68
DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.13-14.61
Citation Marvin A. Hamstad, 2006, Advanced Materials Research, 13-14, 61
Online since February, 2006
Authors Marvin A. Hamstad
Keywords AE Dipoles, AE Monopoles, Finite Element Model (FEM), Lamb Wave, Pencil Lead Breaks PLBs
Abstract

Acoustic emission (AE) practitioners routinely use surface pencil lead breaks (monopoles) to observe expected AE signal characteristics. In contrast, stress-generated AE sources are almost universally composed of dipoles. Thus, understanding the primary differences between the signals generated by these two different source classes is of key importance. This research had the goal of analyzing and contrasting the AE signals generated by monopole and dipole sources. A finite-element-modeled database of AE signals provided an ideal means to study these two source types. The AE signals represented the top-surface out-of-plane displacement versus time from point sources inside an aluminum plate 4.7 mm thick. In addition, monopole sources both on the plate top surface and the edge surface were included in the database. The AE signals were obtained from both in-plane and out-of-plane monopole and dipole sources. Results were analyzed with both a 100 to 300 kHz bandpass filter and a 40 kHz high-pass filter. The wide-plate specimen domain effectively eliminated edge reflections from interfering with the direct signal arrivals.

Full Paper PDF Get the full paper by clicking here

First page example

Preview of first page