Paper Title:

Determination of Dynamic Fracture Toughness Using Strain Measurement

Periodical Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 261 - 263)
Main Theme Advances in Fracture and Failure Prevention
Edited by Kikuo Kishimoto, Masanori Kikuchi, Tetsuo Shoji and Masumi Saka
Pages 313-318
DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.261-263.313
Citation Duck Hoi Kim et al., 2004, Key Engineering Materials, 261-263, 313
Online since April, 2004
Authors Duck Hoi Kim, Soon Il Moon, Jae Hoon Kim
Keywords AA7075-T6, AA7175-T74, Dynamic Fracture Toughness, Loading Rate, M 250, Strain Measurement, Ti6Al4V Alloy, Weibull Analysis
Price US$ 28,-
Article Preview
View full size
Abstract

By contrast with static fracture toughness determination, the methodology for dynamic fracture toughness characterization is not yet standardized and appropriate approaches must be devised. The accurate determination of the dynamic stress intensity factors must take into account inertial effects. Most methods for dynamic fracture toughness measurement are experimentally complex. However, dynamic fracture toughness determination using strain measurement is extremely attractive in terms of experimental simplicity. In this study, dynamic fracture toughness tests using strain measurement are performed. High rate tension and charpy impact tests are carried out for titanium alloy, maraging steel and Al alloys. In the case of evaluating the dynamic fracture toughness using high rate tension and charpy impact tests, load or energy methods are used commonly. The consideration about inertial effects is essential, because load or energy methods are influenced by inertia. In contrast, if the position for optimum response of strain is provided, dynamic fracture toughness evaluation using strain near crack tip is more accurate. To obtain the position for optimum response of strain, a number of gages were attached at angles of 60°. Reliability for experimental results is evaluated by Weibull analysis. The method presented in this paper is easy to implement in a laboratory and it provides accurate results compared to results from load or energy methods influenced by inertia.