Comparison of Validity between WST-1 and MTT Test in Bioceramic Materials |
|
| Journal | Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 284 - 286) |
|---|---|
| Volume | Bioceramics 17 |
| Edited by | Panjian Li, Kai Zhang and Clifford W. Colwell, Jr. |
| Pages | 585-588 |
| DOI | 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.284-286.585 |
| Citation | Kwang Mahn Kim et al., 2005, Key Engineering Materials, 284-286, 585 |
| Online since | April, 2005 |
| Authors | Kwang Mahn Kim, Sang Bae Lee, Se Ho Lee, Yong Keun Lee, Kyoung Nam Kim |
| Keywords | Bioceramic, Biocompatibility, Cytotoxicity, MTT, Proliferation Assay, WST-1 |
| Abstract | Cytotoxicity test was essential for the pre-clinical evaluation of bioceramics. Proliferation assays such as MTT, XTT and WST-1 were commonly used for measuring biocompatibility. WST-1 was more convenient than MTT because of its water-solubility and storage condition. The calcium phosphate glass and β-TCP have been used for bone substitute, and some magnetic ferrites have been used for hyperthermic treatment. L929, mouse fibroblast cell, was the representative cell-line for in vitro biocompatibility test. The extracts of test samples were prepared by ISO10993-12:2002. The biocompatibilities of the extracts were measured by MTT and WST-1 assay and their pH were measured with pH meter. The cellular survival rate of CPG was the lowest and the results of the WST-1 test showed results similar to those of the MTT test. Thus, proliferation assays using WST-1 may be conveniently and routinely applicable to pre-clinical evaluation of bioceramics. |
| Full Paper |
Get the full paper by clicking here
|
