Materials Science & Technology

FULLTEXT SEARCH
NEW: Advanced Search

Comparison between Conventional and Performance Demonstration UT Method by Round Robin Test

Journal Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 321 - 323)
Volume Advanced Nondestructive Evaluation I
Edited by Seung-Seok Lee, Joon Hyun Lee, Ik Keun Park, Sung-Jin Song, Man Yong Choi
Pages 1754-1757
DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.321-323.1754
Citation Yong Sik Kim et al., 2006, Key Engineering Materials, 321-323, 1754
Online since October, 2006
Authors Yong Sik Kim, Seung Han Yang, Byung Sik Yoon, Hee Jong Lee
Keywords Performance Demonstration, Round Robin Tests, Ultrasonic Testing (UT)
Abstract

The results of ultrasonic testing performed during in-service inspection period for main components of nuclear power plant are affected by the performance of each inspector. To enhance the inspection reliability, the more restrictive qualification is required. KEPRI established Korean performance demonstration (KPD) system for the ultrasonic testing personnel, equipment and procedure which applied to the piping examination of nuclear power plant. A round robin test was conducted to evaluate the reliability of examination result by comparing conventional (DAC) UT and performance demonstration (PD) UT method. Participants took detection/length sizing test and depth sizing test using DAC method and PD method. The results showed that the PD method was preciser and more accurate than the conventional DAC method in length and depth sizing regardless of field experience and PD qualification status.

Full Paper PDF Get the full paper by clicking here

First page example

Preview of first page