The Differences between the Direct and Sol-Gel Syntheses of Silicon-Contained Calcium Phosphates |
|
| Journal | Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 361 - 363) |
|---|---|
| Volume | Bioceramics 20 |
| Edited by | Guy Daculsi and Pierre Layrolle |
| Pages | 107-110 |
| DOI | 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.361-363.107 |
| Citation | Sergey V. Dorozhkin et al., 2007, Key Engineering Materials, 361-363, 107 |
| Online since | November, 2007 |
| Authors | Sergey V. Dorozhkin, Oguzhan Gunduz, Faik N. Oktar |
| Keywords | Bioceramic, Calcium Phosphate, Direct Preparation, Hydroxyapatite (HA), Silicon, Sol-Gel Technology, Tricalcium Phosphate |
| Abstract | Comparison of two experimental techniques of silicon-contained and/or silica-substituted calcium phosphate preparation from Ca(NO3)2·4H2O, NH4H2PO4, fumed silica and aqueous solution of NH4OH was performed. The first technique was a traditional one, in which the final product was synthesized in an aqueous solution by the well-known sol-gel process, followed by phase separation, washing off, drying and high-temperature sintering. An environmentally friendly direct preparation route was the second technique, in which the initial chemicals were mixed in the necessary proportions inside a crucible, followed by a high-temperature sintering of the entire mixture. The sintered powders were analyzed by the standard measurement techniques. Intentional variations from the stoichiometry within ±10% of the amounts of the mixed chemicals were employed to compare the vulnerability of both preparation techniques to random fluctuations of the processing parameters. The results revealed a better reproducibility and a higher yield of the direct preparation technique but the traditional sol-gel technique was found to be able to compensate accidental technological imperfections. |
| Full Paper |
Get the full paper by clicking here
|
