In Vitro Assessment of Hydroxyapatite and Si-Substituted Hydroxyapatite Coatings under Different VPS Conditions
| Periodical | Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 396 - 398) |
|---|---|
| Main Theme | Bioceramics 21 |
| Edited by | Marcelo Prado and Cecília Zavaglia |
| Pages | 345-348 |
| DOI | 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.396-398.345 |
| Citation | Qian Tang et al., 2008, Key Engineering Materials, 396-398, 345 |
| Online since | October, 2008 |
| Authors | Qian Tang, Roger Brooks, Serena Best |
| Keywords | Hydroxyapatite (HAP), In Vitro, Plasma Gun Input Power, Si-Substituted Hydroxyapatite, Vacuum Plasma Spray, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) |
| Price | US$ 28,- |
Hydroxyapatite and silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite powers were prepared in-house through a wet precipitation method and then vacuum plasma sprayed onto Ti-6Al-4V discs. Two plasma gun input powers were employed, 37 kW and 40 kW. All coatings were nearly phase pure, except small traces of impurities (TTCP, -TCP and CaO). Coatings prepared under the lower plasma gun input power had lower crystallinity. In vitro studies showed that human osteoblast-like cells attached and spread very well on all coated discs. Among the four kinds of discs, SiHAC37 was the most supportive to cell growth.