Materials Science & Technology

FULLTEXT SEARCH
NEW: Advanced Search

Reconstruction of Stress and Composition Profiles from X-Ray Diffraction Experiments — How to Avoid Ghost Stresses?

Journal Materials Science Forum (Volumes 443 - 444)
Volume European Powder Diffraction EPDIC 8
Edited by Yvonne Andersson, Eric J. Mittemeijer and Udo Welzel
Pages 91-94
DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.443-444.91
Citation Thomas L. Christiansen et al., 2004, Materials Science Forum, 443-444, 91
Online since January, 2004
Authors Thomas L. Christiansen, Marcel A.J. Somers
Keywords Depth Profiling, Residual Stress, Successive Layer Removal, X-Ray Diffraction (XRD)
Abstract

On evaluating lattice strain-depth or stress-depth profiles with X-ray diffraction, the variation of the information depth while combining various tilt angles, in combination with lattice spacing gradients leads to artefacts, so-called ghost or fictitious stresses. X-ray diffraction lattice-strain analysis was simulated for a model stress-depth profile combined with a composition-depth profile. Two principally different methods were investigated for the reconstruction of the actual stress and composition profiles from the simulated data: - considering the stress/strain determined at a specific depth as a weighted average over the actual stress/strain depth profile - considering the lattice spacing determined at a specific depth, for a specific value for as a weighted average over the actual lattice spacing profile for this direction. On the basis of the results it is possible to propose a preferred method for the evaluation of stress/strain and composition profiles, while minimising the risk for ghost stresses.

Full Paper PDF Get the full paper by clicking here

First page example

Preview of first page