Paper Title:
Distribution of the Quality Index in AlSiMg Castings Produced by Different Processes: Reality vs Prediction
  Abstract

The Quality Index is a useful tool allowing to assess the metallurgical quality of aluminium AlSiMg foundry alloys (AlSi7Mg03/AlSi7Mg06, or A356/357 in North America). Its value, calculated from the ultimate tensile strength and elongation, increases with the metallurgical quality of the casting, i.e. with finer dendrites, lower microporosity, lower iron content and cleaner metal. This Quality Index does not depend on the degree of temper applied during the heat treatment (aging time and temperature). This paper will briefly explain how solidification modeling can provide the local value of the Quality Index, via the secondary dendrite arm spacing and level of microporisity calculated from the predicted values of the local solidification time and solidus velocity. The validity of the predictions has been assessed against the properties of tensile specimens excised from parts of different geometries produced by a variety of casting processes, as reported in the literature. The case study of a race car bell housing poured by two processes, namely gravity sand casting (GSC) and low pressure die casting (LPDC, or LPPM for Low Pressure Permanent Mold in North America), will be the focus of the present paper. The Quality Index has been measured and predicted at 3 locations in the castings after a T6 temper was applied which resulted in a minimum elongation of 5% for both the GDC and LPDC bell housings. Metallographic examination and image analysis allowed to quantify the superior metallurgical quality of the LPDC housings when compared to their GDC competitors.

  Info
Periodical
Chapter
Chapter 5: Microstructure and Properties
Edited by
Hajo Dieringa, Norbert Hort and Karl Ulrich Kainer
Pages
238-241
DOI
10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.690.238
Citation
F. Chiesa, N. Giguère, B. Duchesne, "Distribution of the Quality Index in AlSiMg Castings Produced by Different Processes: Reality vs Prediction", Materials Science Forum, Vol. 690, pp. 238-241, 2011
Online since
June 2011
Export
Price
$32.00
Share

In order to see related information, you need to Login.

In order to see related information, you need to Login.

Authors: Shao Yong Xu, Si Yuan Long, Fen Ge Li
Abstract:This paper analyzes the casting process characteristics of Mg alloys compared with Al alloys in the production of high quality (i.e....
113
Authors: Mohammad M. Haque, Ahmad Faris Ismail
Abstract:Green sand casting and chill mould casting methods are representing the slow and fast cooling rates of the brass casting, respectively. The...
7
Authors: I. Basu, J.T. Wood, Jonathan P. Weiler
Chapter 11: Magnesium Alloys
Abstract:In this study, commercial AM60B magnesium alloy was studied under different solidification conditions to understand the influence of cooling...
1279
Authors: Derya Dispinar, S. Akhtar, A. Nordmark, F. Syvertsen, M. Di Sabatino, L. Arnberg
Chapter 2: Forming in Melt or Near Melt Condition
Abstract:Gravity die casting (GDC) and low pressure die casting (LPDC) methods were used to compare the mechanical properties and porosity...
283
Authors: Man Huan Li, Guo Xing Tang, Wei Min Mao, Yong Feng Liu
Chapter 1: Advanced Materials Science
Abstract:The semisolid slurry of A356 Al alloy was prepared by low superheat pouring and weak traveling-wave electromagnetic stirring (LSPWES), and...
69