Papers by Keyword: Pitting Resistance

Abstract: Pitting resistance of super martensitic stainless steel 00Cr13Ni5Mo2 made in China has been investigated by employing electrochemical technology and chemical immersion methods. The results showed that pitting potential of super martensitic stainless steel decreased with the increasing of NaCl concentration and temperature, respectively. And corrosion rate of super martensitic stainless steel increased with the increasing of temperature. Furthermore, compared to super martensitic stainless steel made in Japan, the domestic one was better in terms of pitting potential, pitting corrosion rate and the density of the pits, but worse in terms of the depth of the pits.

Abstract: Corrosion rate, corrosion potential and susceptibility to pitting corrosion of a metal are measured using cyclic polarization Direct Current (DC) electrochemical technique. The aim of the present research is to investigate the pit nucleation resistance of polished, ground and passivated surfaces of 316 stainless steels in Ringers solution. The electrochemical cyclic polarization results showed that polished surface gave better pitting resistance as compared to ground surface. It was also observed that passivation treatment gave better pitting resistance to both polished and ground surface of 316 stainless steels in Ringers solution.

Abstract: Research on the effect of ion implantation on the corrosion behaviour of metals has been carried out for years, but some difficulties arise in the comparison of the obtained results due to variations in experimental conditions (alloys, surface preparation, doses, experimental techniques...). This work tries to overcome those differences, presenting the effect of several elements (Ce+, N+, Cr+ and Cr+ N+) implanted in similar conditions on the pitting corrosion resistance of AISI 430 stainless steel. Potentiodynamic measurements in 1M NaCl demonstrate the beneficial effect of all the implanted elements, showing that Ce+ is the less efficient ion, while Cr+ N+ co-implantation gives the best results in terms of localized attack resistance. Pitting morphology is explained in terms of the XPS and GIXRD data that allow chemical and structural characterization of the implanted layer. Those results help to enlighten the protection mechanisms involved in the considered implantations.