Mapping Urban Vulnerability: The Case Study of Gran Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic

Abstract:

Article Preview

The paper discusses research criteria for mapping urban vulnerability, focusing on the elements at risk. The study works in the framework of the "case-study research" and takes in account the impacts of a specific hazard risk (seismic event) in the City of Gran Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. The paper proposes a critical framework that addresses planning methods toward a more efficient support to face seismic hazard.The research question is how vulnerable are contemporary cities? And, is it possible to promote city resistance through more adequate knowledge about the assets at risk? So the study starts from the concept of risk as combination of hazard, vulnerability and exposure and propose a risk oriented methodology aimed at collecting and interpreting data about the comprehensive vulnerability of the city. Based on innovative structure of a dedicated GIS inventory, the model describes the elements at risk by a set of specific applying indicators purposely selected in order to mapping the exposure of the city to a seismic hazard and to represent urban vulnerability.

Info:

Periodical:

Edited by:

Carmelina Bevilacqua, Francesco Calabrò and Lucia Della Spina

Pages:

142-148

DOI:

10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.11.142

Citation:

M. Rigillo and E. Cervelli, "Mapping Urban Vulnerability: The Case Study of Gran Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic", Advanced Engineering Forum, Vol. 11, pp. 142-148, 2014

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] OECD: Innovation in Country Risk Mangement. Studies in Risk Management, OECD, Paris (2009).

[2] UN-ISDR: Hyogo Framework for Action 2005-2015: Building the Resilience of Nations and Communities to Disasters, Geneva, Switzerland (2005), information on http: /www. unisdr. org.

[3] UN-ISDR: Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction: Invest Today for a Safer Tomorrow, United Nations, Geneva (2009).

[4] UN-ISDR: Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction: Revealing Risks, Redefining Development, United Nations, Geneva, Switzerland (2009).

[5] P. Keefer, E. Neumayer, T. Plumper: Earthquake propensity and the politics of mortality prevention, edited by World Bank (2010), information on http: /econ. worldbank. org.

[6] F. Shah, F. Ranghieri: A work book on planning for urban resilience in the face of disasters: adapting experiences from Vietnam's cities to other cities, edited by World Bank (2012), information on http: /econ. worldbank. org.

DOI: 10.1596/9780821388785_ch05

[7] H. Brecht, U. Deichmann, H.G. Wang: A global urban risk index, edited by World Bank (2013), information on http: /econ. worldbank. org.

[8] World Economic Forum: Global Risks 2007: A Global Risk Network Report. Geneva, Switzerland (2007).

[9] World Development Reports: Risk and Opportunity. Managing risk for development, (2014).

[10] S. Hallegatte, V. Przyluski: The Economics of Natural Disaster (2010), information on: https: /openknowledge. worldbank. org/bitstream/handle/10986/3991/WPS5507. pdf?sequence=1.

[11] K. Smith: Environmental Hazards: Assessing Risk and Reducing Disaster, Routledge (2009).

[12] T. Kidokoro, J. Okata, S. Matsumura, N. Shima: Vulnerable Cities: Realities, Innovation and Strategies, Springer (2008).

DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-78149-3

[13] P. Berque, T. Beatley: Planning for earthquake, risk, politics and policy, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimora (1991).

[14] I. Cremonini (edited by): Rischio sismico e pianificazione nei centri storici, IMU Emilia Romagna (1994).

[15] S. Greiving, M. Fleischhauer, S. Wanczura: Management of natural hazard in Europe: the role of spatial planning in selected EU member states. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Vol. 49, Issue 5, Taylor & Francis (2006).

DOI: 10.1080/09640560600850044

[16] Information on http: /csur. t. u-tokyo. ac. jp/research/vulnerable_urban_en. html.

[17] M. Rigillo, M. Clemente, G. Esposito, S. Gilchriest: Urban Form and City Environment. A proposed Methodology for understanding sustainability, edited by P. DeJoanna, D. Francese, Passaro (edited by): Sustainable Mediterrean Construction, vol. I Franco Angeli editore, ISBN 9788820414368 (2012).

[18] D. J. Varnes & International Association of Engineering Geology (IAEG): Landslide hazard zonation: a review of principles and practice, UNESCO Report (1984).

[19] R. Davidson: A multidisciplinary urban earthquake disaster risk index. Earthquake Spectra, 13(2), (1997) p.211–223.

DOI: 10.1193/1.1585942

[20] O. Cardona: Indicators of Disaster Risk and Risk Management: Program for Latin America and the Carribean, Main Technical Report. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) (2005).

[21] R. Fistola: Sistema Urbano e Vulnerabilità (2010), Information on http: /www. romano fistola. it/vsut2. pdf.

[22] Italian Republic, Ministry for the Environment, Land and Sea and ISPRA and Basin Authority of national and districts river basin: Indirizzi operativi per l'attuazione della Direttiva 2007/60/CE relativa alla valutazione e alla gestione dei rischi da alluvioni con riferimento alla predisposizione delle mappe della pericolosità e del rischio di alluvioni (2013).

[23] M. A. Sharifi, V. Retsios: Site selection for waste disposal through spatial multiple criteria decision analysis, In: Journal of telecommunications and information technology, (2004).

[24] T. L. Saaty: Theory and applications of the Analytic Netwok Process: Decision Making with Benefits, Opportunities, Costs and Risk (3rd edn), RWS Pubblications, Pittsburg, USA (2005).

[25] M. Pelling, The vulnerability of cities. Natural disaster and social resilience, Earthscan Publication, U.K. (2003).

[26] Dominican Republic, Law 147: Sobre Gestión de Riesgos (2002).

In order to see related information, you need to Login.