Place-Based Approach: A US-EU Comparison

Abstract:

Article Preview

A basic requirement to achieve economic development within a State or a union of states is to reduce spatial inequalities between the different regions and cities. Both in the European Union and in the United States, development budget funds are assigned to local development strategies. In this perspective, the place-based approach furthers regional development by tailoring policies to the specific economic and social contexts. American and European case studies reveal strengths and weaknesses of policies involved in the local development process while pursuing the spatial equity distribution principle. American case studies such as Dudley Street, Boston MA and Washington Gateway Main Street, Boston MA, reveal a consolidate recourse to corporations, organizations and institutions in order to implement the place-based initiatives. On the other side, European case studies such as Berlin-Brandenburg, Germany and West Midlands, United Kingdom and others, denote an ad-hoc practice but at the same time a wider scope of application. Final observations enable to implement the theoretical knowledge on the places-based approach as a driver to thrive local development.

Info:

Periodical:

Edited by:

Carmelina Bevilacqua, Francesco Calabrò and Lucia Della Spina

Pages:

35-40

DOI:

10.4028/www.scientific.net/AEF.11.35

Citation:

S. A. Falcomatà et al., "Place-Based Approach: A US-EU Comparison", Advanced Engineering Forum, Vol. 11, pp. 35-40, 2014

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] F. Barca: An Agenda for a Reformed Cohesion Policy, A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations, Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy (2009).

[2] J. Tomaney: Place-Based Approaches to Regional Development: Global Trends and Australian Implications, A report for the Australian Business Foundation, OECD (2010), p.10.

[3] J.O. Farnum, L.E. Kruger, Place-based Planning: Innovations and Applications from four Western Forests, Portland (2008), p.3.

DOI: 10.2737/pnw-gtr-741

[4] K. CL. Gudrun, B. Pleskovic: Spatial Disparities and Development Policy, Workshop Series World Bank, Berlin (2009), p.250.

[5] N. Cattan: Cities and networks in Europe. A critical approach of polycentrism, Hors collection John Libbey, UK (2007), p.78.

[6] Commission of the European Communities 2012. Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council, COM(12)496, Annex 1, point 3. 3. 2. Brussels (2012), pp . C 17-61.

[7] Common Guidance of the European Commission, Community Led-Local Development in European Structural and Investment Funds, Draft Version (2013), pp.4-60.

[8] E. Baier, H. Kroll, A. Zenker: Templates of smart specialisation: Experiences of place-based regional development strategies in Germany and Austria, (Working Papers Firms and Region No. R5/2013), ISI Karlsruhe, Fraunhofer (2013).

[9] A.C. Vidal, W.D. Keating: Community Development: current issues and emerging challenges. In: Journal of Urban Affairs, Vol. 26 Issue 2, (2004), pp.125-137.

[10] J. De Filippis, S. Saegert, The Community Development Reader, 2nd edition, Routledge, New York (2012).

[11] The CLUDs Network: First Scientific Report, Economic Development Strategies - the Role of Public Private Partnership, (2012).

[12] R. Ortega-Argilés: Economic Transformation Strategies, Smart Specialization Case Studies, University of Groningen (2012).

In order to see related information, you need to Login.