Mechanical Product Analogy Design Method Based on Structure Similarity

Abstract:

Article Preview

By use of function-behavior-structure-shape model, an analogy design method for mechanical products based on structure similarity is presented. Structure model includes qualitative models of symbol part structure and product assembly structure. It is an information carrier to connect conceptual design and detail design. The main aim to set up structure model is to realize design reuse. By use of the structure similarity between source design and target design the product design is picked-up. The 16 types of design processes based on analogy are present. Finally structure design modeling is divided into three levels, namely symbol modeling, structure modeling and feature modeling. The structure hierarchical modeling method is discussed.

Info:

Periodical:

Edited by:

Quanjie Gao

Pages:

320-326

Citation:

P. C. Nan and J. Xu, "Mechanical Product Analogy Design Method Based on Structure Similarity", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 127, pp. 320-326, 2012

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

$41.00

[1] Bhatta S, Goel A K. From design experiences to generic mechanisms: mode-based learning in analogical design. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 1996(10): 131-136.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0890060400001372

[2] Goel A. Design, Analogy and creativity. IEEE Expert, 1997, 12(2): 62-70.

[3] Daniel A, McAdams, Kristin L, Wood. A quantitative similarity metric for design-by-analogy. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2002, 124(2): 173~182.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1475317

[4] Qian L, Gero J S. Function-behavior-structure paths and their role in analogy-based design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 1996, 10: 289-312.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0890060400001633

[5] Gero J S, Kazakov V. Using analogy to extend the behavior state space in design. In the Fourth International Conference on Computational Models of Creative Design, Sydney: University of Sydney, 1999, 113-143.