The Behaviour of Fibre-Metal Laminates under High Velocity Impact Loading with Different Stacking Sequences of Al Alloy

Abstract:

Article Preview

The high velocity impact response of composite laminated plates has been experimentally investigated using a nitrogen gas gun. Tests were undertaken on fibre-metal laminate (FML) structures based on Kevlar-29 fiber/epoxy-Alumina resin with different stacking sequences of 6061-T6 Al plates. Impact testing was conducted using a cylindrical shape of 7.62 mm diameter steel projectile at 400m/s velocity, which was investigated to achieve complete perforation of the target. The numerical parametric study of ballistic impacts caused by similar conditions in experimental work is undertaken to predict the ballistic limit velocity, energy absorbed by the target, and comparisons between simulations by using ANSYS AUTODYN 3D v.12.1 software and experimental work to study the effects of the shape of the projectile with different (4, 8, 12, 16 and 20mm) thicknesses on the ballistic limit velocity. While only one thickness was used with 24mm of back stacking sequence, it was not penetrated. The sequence of the Al plate position (front, middle and back) inside laminate plates of the composite specimen was also studied. The Al back stacking sequence plate for the overall results obtained was the optimum structure to resist the impact loading. The simulation results obtained of the residual velocity hereby are in good agreement with the experimental results with an average error of 1.8%. The energy absorption was obtained with 7.3% and 2.7% of the back to front and back to middle of the Al stacking sequence respectively. Hence, the back Al stacking sequence is considered the optimum position for resisting the impact loading. The data showed that these novel sandwich structures exhibit excellent energy-absorbing characteristics under high-velocity impact loading conditions. Hence, it is considered suitable for aerospace applications.

Info:

Periodical:

Main Theme:

Edited by:

R. Varatharajoo, E. J. Abdullah, D. L. Majid, F. I. Romli, A. S. Mohd Rafie and K. A. Ahmad

Pages:

213-218

Citation:

A.A. Ramadhan et al., "The Behaviour of Fibre-Metal Laminates under High Velocity Impact Loading with Different Stacking Sequences of Al Alloy", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 225, pp. 213-218, 2012

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] E.C. Botelho, R.A. Silva, L.C. Pardini, M.C. Rezende, A review on the development and properties of continuous fiber/epoxy/aluminum hybrid composites for aircraft structures, Mater Res. 9 (2006) 3, 247–56.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1516-14392006000300002

[2] S. Bernhardt, M. Ramulu, A.S. Kobayashi, Low-velocity impact response characterization of a hybrid titanium composite laminate, J Eng Mater Technol. 129 (2007) 220–226.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2400272

[3] G.R. Villanueva, W.J. Cantwell, The high velocity impact response of composite and FML-reinforced sandwich structures, Compos Sci Technol. 64 (2004) 35–54.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0266-3538(03)00197-0

[4] T. Beumler, F. Pellenkoft, A. Tillich, W. Wohlers, C. Smart, Airbus costumer benefit from fiber metal laminates. Airbus Deutschland GmbH. Ref. no: L53pr0605135-Issue 1. (2006) p.1–18.

[5] R.C. Alderliesten, R. Benedictus, Fiber/metal composite technology for future primary aircraft structures, 48th Aiaa/Asme/Asce/Ahs/Asc structures, structural dynamics, and materials conference 15th; April 23–26. Honolulu, Hawaii; (2007) p.1–12.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-2404

[6] P Cortes, W.J. Cantwell, The prediction of tensile failure in titanium-based thermoplastic fibre–metal laminates, Compos Sci Technol. 66 (2006) 2306–16.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.11.031

[7] A. Asundi, Choi Alta YN, Fiber metal laminates: an advanced material for future aircraft, J Mater Process Technol. 63 (1997) 384–94.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0924-0136(96)02652-0

[8] L.B. Vogelesang, A. Vlot, Development of fibre metal laminates for advanced, J Mater Process Technol. 103 (2000) 1–5.

[9] J. Schijve, L.B. Vogelesang, R. Marissen U.S. patent numbers 4, 500, 589 and 4, 489, 123. European patent number 005628.

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.