A Preliminary Study of Baseline Design Architecture Effects on Aircraft Redesign Risks

Abstract:

Article Preview

Aircraft redesign process normally does not start from scratch and requires a well-defined reference baseline design as the starting point for redesign changes. In general, the baseline design is often chosen based on the closeness of its existing performance capability to the driving requirement. This practice essentially presumes that such condition guarantees a minimum amount of required redesign changes, hence the least development risk. However, it is argued here in this study that such notion can be misleading because risk also depends on the type and the extent of the changes. Instead, it is believed that the existing baseline design architecture is an important element that will influence its suitability for the redesign task at hand. Through a sample aircraft redesign case study, the possible effects of existing design architecture on the redesign process is demonstrated and highlighted.

Info:

Periodical:

Main Theme:

Edited by:

R. Varatharajoo, E. J. Abdullah, D. L. Majid, F. I. Romli, A. S. Mohd Rafie and K. A. Ahmad

Pages:

287-292

Citation:

F. I. Romli et al., "A Preliminary Study of Baseline Design Architecture Effects on Aircraft Redesign Risks", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 225, pp. 287-292, 2012

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] Eckert, C., M. Stacey, and C. Earl, References to Past Designs, in Studying Designers '05. 2005, Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition: Sydney, Australia.

[2] Condom, P., Derivative Strategy Show Its Limits, in Interactive Business and Technology. (1997).

[3] Murman, E.M., M. Walton, and E. Rebentisch, Challenges in the Better, Faster, Cheaper Era of Aeronautical Design, Engineering and Manufacturing, in The Lean Aerospace Initiative Report Series (RP00-02). 2000, Massachusetts Institute of Technology: Cambridge, USA.

[4] Clarkson, P.J., C. Simmons, and C. Eckert, Change Prediction for Product Redesign, in International Conference on Engineering Design. 2001: Glasgow, UK.

[5] Clarkson, P.J., C. Simmons, and C. Eckert, Predicting Change Propagation in Complex Design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 2004. 126(5).

[6] Terwiesch, C. and C.H. Loch, Managing the Process of Engineering Change Orders: The Case of the Climate Control System in Automobile Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1999. 16(2).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0737-6782(98)00041-1

[7] Eckert, C., P.J. Clarkson, and W. Zanker, Change and Customization in Complex Engineering Domains. Research in Engineering Design, 2004. 15(1).

[8] Romli, F.I., et al., Subsystems Change Ranking Methodology (SCRaM) for Complex Product Redesign Process. Advanced Materials Research, 2011. 308-310.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.308-310.167

[9] Christian, J.A. and J.R. Olds, A Quantitative Methodology for Identifying Evolvable Space Systems, in 1st Space Exploration Conference: Continuing the Voyage of Discovery. 2005: Orlanda, USA.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2005-2543

[10] Crossland, R., J.S. Williams, and C. McMahon, The Practical Application of Design Risk Assessment Models. Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 2003. 217(2).

[11] Hobson, B., A technology Maturity Measurement System for Department of National Defense: The TML System, in Defense R&D Canada - Atlantic. (2006).

[12] Wild, T.W., Transport Category Aircraft Systems. 1996, Englewood: Jeppensen Sanderson Inc.

[13] Feiner, L.J., Power Electronics Transform Aircraft Systems, in Wescon Conference. 1994: Anaheim, USA.

[14] Karimi, K., Electric Power System Design, in Boeing MEA Seminar Series (Power Quality). (2005).