Emissions Performance Study for Conventional Aircraft Designs

Abstract:

Article Preview

Conventional aircraft designs have been highly successful within commercial passengers transport markets for a very long time, as evident from current fleet of many airlines. However, with the anticipated stricter environmental regulations to be imposed on future flight operations by the related governing bodies, the relevance of conventional aircraft designs to remain competitive has been questioned. On the other hand, some research ventures have been made to pursue revolutionary designs like blended wing body (BWB). This study aims to preliminarily assess the comparison of expected future emission performance between conventional aircraft design and blended wing body design. It addresses the ongoing debate on whether conventional aircraft designs can be expected to be able to cope with impending stricter environmental regulations and/or whether the venture into revolutionary designs is really necessary. Analyses done are largely based on the historical trends of conventional aircraft designs with regards to the lift-to-drag ratio and fuel consumption parameters. As for the blended wing body, its projected emissions performance is based on published data in the literature. The outcome from these analyses solidifies the belief that conventional aircraft designs will face tougher chances to remain operational under new environmental regulations and the search for revolutionary design with better aerodynamic efficiency such as blended wing body is becoming rather necessary.

Info:

Periodical:

Main Theme:

Edited by:

R. Varatharajoo, E. J. Abdullah, D. L. Majid, F. I. Romli, A. S. Mohd Rafie and K. A. Ahmad

Pages:

385-390

Citation:

F. I. Romli and M. S. Kamaruddin, "Emissions Performance Study for Conventional Aircraft Designs", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 225, pp. 385-390, 2012

Online since:

November 2012

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] Alamdari, F.E. and D. Brewer, Taxation Policy for Aircraft Emissions. Transport Policy, 1994. 1(3): pp.149-159.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-070x(94)90011-6

[2] Garber, D.P., P. Minnis, and P.K. Costulis, A Commercial Flight Track Database for Upper Tropospheric Aircraft Emission Studies over the USA and Southern Canada. Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 2005. 14(4): pp.445-452.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2005/0061

[3] Sgouridis, S., P.A. Bonnefoy, and R.J. Hansman, Air Transportation in a Carbon Constrained World: Long-term Dynamics of Policies and Strategies for Mitigating the Carbon Footprint of Commercial Aviation. Transportation Research Part A, 2011. 45: pp.1077-1091.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2010.03.019

[4] Brueckner, J.K. and A. Zhang, Airline Emission Charges: Effects on Airfares, Service Quality and Aircraft Design. Transportation Research Part B, 2010. 44: pp.960-971.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2010.02.006

[5] The Right Flightpath to Reduce Aviation Emissions, in UNFCCC Climate Talks. 2010, Air Transport Action Group.

[6] European Aeronautics: A Vision for 2020, in Report of the Group of Personalities. (2001).

[7] Raymer, D.P., Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach. 1992, Washington, D.C.: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc.

[8] Block, B., Aviation Industry Outlines Ambitious Climate Goals. 2011, Worldwatch Institute.

[9] Wickenheiser, T.J., et al., Emissionless Aircraft: Requirements and Challenges, in AIAA/ICAS International Air and Space Symposium and Exposition: The Next 100 Y. 2003: Dayton, USA.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-2810

[10] Babikian, R., The Historical Fuel Efficiency Characteristics of Regional Aircraft from Technological, Operational and Cost Perspectives, in Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics. 2001, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

[11] Qin, N., et al., Aerodynamic Studies for Blended Wing Body Aircraft, in 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization. 2002: Atlanta, USA.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2002-5448