Studies on Post-Yield Behavior of Cortical Bone


Article Preview

Complex hierarchical assembly and presence of large amount of organics and water content are responsible for enough amount of plasticity in bone material. Plastic properties are not only important to assess the various changes and fracture risk in bone but also for the development of better bone implants and joint replacements. The present study is focused on the post-yield behavior of cortical bone. The plastic properties of goat femoral and tibiae cortical bone were assessed and compared in terms of plastic modulus (H), tangent modulus (Et), plastic work (Wp) and plastic strain (εp) using uniaxial tensile test. Both femoral and tibiae cortical bone were found to be having similar post-yield behavior and significant stiffness loss was observed in both the bones during plastic deformation. The value of plastic modulus for femoral cortical bone was found to be 1.2 times higher as compared to the corresponding value for tibiae cortical bone. This shows higher hardening rate for femoral cortical bone. It was also observed that femoral bone requires higher energy during plastic deformation until fracture as compared to tibiae cortical bone.



Edited by:

Amanda Wu




N.K. Sharma et al., "Studies on Post-Yield Behavior of Cortical Bone", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 232, pp. 157-161, 2012

Online since:

November 2012




[1] J.Y. Rho, L. Kuhn-Spearing and P. Zioupos: Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone, Med. Eng. Phys., Vol. 20 (1998), pp.92-102.


[2] A.H. Burstein, J.M. Zika, K.G. Heiple and L. Klein: Contribution of collagen and minerals to elastic-plastic properties of bone, J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am., Vol. 57 (1975), pp.956-961.


[3] J. Yan, J.J. Mecholsky Jr, and K.B. Clifton: How tough is bone? Application of elastic-plastic fracture mechanics to bone, Bone, Vol. 40 (2007), pp.479-484.


[4] J.S. Nyman, A. Roy, X. Shen, R.L. Acuna, J.H. Tyler and X. Wang: The influence of water removal on the strength and toughness of cortical bone. J. Biomech., Vol. 39 (2006), pp.931-938.


[5] N.K. Sharma, D.K. Sehgal and R.K. Pandey: Effect of Orientation on Elastic-plastic Fracture Toughness of Cortical Bone, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, Vol. III (2011), pp.2298-2302.

[6] N.K. Sharma, D.K. Sehgal and R.K. Pandey: Orientation dependence of elastic-plastic fracture toughness and micro-fracture mechanism in cortical bone, Engineering letters, Vol. 19 (2011), pp.304-309.

[7] Q.D. Yang, B.N. Cox, R.K. Nalla and R.O. Ritchie: Re-evaluating the toughness of human cortical bone, Bone, Vol. 38 (2006), pp.878-887.


[8] Q.D. Yang, B.N. Cox, R.K. Nalla and R.O. Ritchie: Fracture length scales in human cortical bone, the necessity of non linear fracture model, Biomaterials, Vol. 27 (2006), pp.2095-2113.


[9] H. Leng, X.N. Dong and X. Wang: Progressive post-yield behavior of human cortical bone in compression for middle-aged and elderly groups, Biomech., Vol. 42 (2009), pp.491-497.


[10] X. Wang and J.S. Nyman: A noval approach to assess post-yield energy dissipation of bone in tension, J. Biomech., Vol. 40 (2007), pp.674-677.


[11] M. Doblare, J.M. Garcia and M.J. Gomez: Modelling bone tissue fracture and healing: a review, Engg. Frac. Mech., Vol. 71 (2004), pp.1809-1840.

[12] J.C. Lotz, E.J. Cheal and W.C. Hayes: Fracture prediction for the proximal femur using finite element models: Part II-Nonlinear analysis, J. Biomech. Engg., Vol. 113 (1991), pp.361-365.


[13] J. Keyak: Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models, Med. Engg. Phys., Vol. 23 (2001), pp.165-173.