Seismical Protection Properties of High Damping Rubber Bearing and Lead Rubber Bearing Base Isolation Systems for Multi-Storey RC Buildings


Article Preview

In the present paper two different base isolation systems, designed and verified according to the european seismic code (EC2 and EC8), are compared for evaluating the behaviour of a base isolated building, highly irregular in plan, in presence of a seismic excitation. The devices adopted for realizing the different base isolation systems are the High Damping Rubber Bearing (HDRB) and the Lead Rubber Bearing (LRB) both of them actuated in parallel with a Friction Slider (FS). A dynamic nonlinear analysis for a three-dimensional base isolated structure has been performed. Recorded accelerograms for bi-directional ground motions, compatible with the reference elastic response spectrum for each limit state have been used for a more realistic evaluation of the seismic response of the structure and a more realistic comparative analysis between the base isolated structure with the different considered base isolation systems and the traditional fixed base structure.



Edited by:

Ford Lumban Gaol




D. Cancellara and F. de Angelis, "Seismical Protection Properties of High Damping Rubber Bearing and Lead Rubber Bearing Base Isolation Systems for Multi-Storey RC Buildings", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 234, pp. 90-95, 2012

Online since:

November 2012




[1] F. Naeim and J. M. Kelly, Design of Seismic Isolated Structures, John Wiley, New York, (1999).

[2] K. L. Ryan and A .K. Chopra, Estimation of seismic demands on isolators based on nonlinear analysis, J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, (2004), 130, pp.392-402.

[3] Y.J. Park, Y.K. Wen and A. H-S. Ang, Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems under Bi-Directional Ground Motions, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 14, (1986).


[4] S. Nagarajaiah, A. M. Reinhorn and M. C. Constantinou, 3D-Basis: Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis of Three-Dimensional Base Isolated Structures: Part II, Technical Report NCEER-91-0005, Nation Center For Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, N.Y., (1991).

[5] E. L. Wilson, Three-Dimensional Static and Dynamic Analysis of Structures, A Physical Approach With Emphasis on Earthquake Engineering, Computers and Structures, Inc., (2003).

[6] Y.K. Wen, Method for Random Vibration of Hysteretic Systems, Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, Vol. 102, No. EM2, (1976).

[7] A.S. Mokha, M.C. Constantinou and A.M. Reinhorn, Teflon bearing in base isolation. I: testing, J. Struct. Engrg. ASCE 116, (1990).


[8] W. H. Robinson and A. G. Tucker, A lead-rubber shear damper, Bull. N. 2. natl. soc. earthquake eng., 10, 151-153, (1977).

[9] W. H. Robinson, Lead rubber hysteretic bearings suitable for protecting structures during earthquakes, PEL Report No. 715, (1981).

[10] EC8, Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance - Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, PrEN1998-1, European Committee for Standardization, TC250/SC8, (2003).


[11] EC2, Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures, UNI EN 1992-1-1, European Committee for Standardization, CEN/TC 250, (2004).

[12] ESD, EuropeanStrong-motion Database, http: /www. isesd. cv. ic. ac. uk/ESD/frameset. htm.

[13] NTC 2008, Decreto Ministeriale 14/01/2008, Nuove Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni, Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 29 del 4 febbraio 2008 - Suppl. Ordinario n. 30, Roma, (2008).

[14] Cancellara, D., De Angelis, F., Pasquino, V., Displacement based approach for the seismic retrofitting of a RC existing building designed for only gravitational loads, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 166-169, (2012), pp.1718-1729.


[15] B. Gutenberg, S.F. Richter, Seismicity of the Earth and Associated Phenomena, 2nd Edition, Princeton University Press, pp.17-19, (1954).

[16] De Angelis, F., An internal variable variational formulation of viscoplasticity, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 190, n. 1-2, (2000), pp.35-54.


[17] De Angelis, F., A variationally consistent formulation of nonlocal plasticity, Int. Journal for Multiscale Computational Engineering, Vol. 5, n. 2, (2007), pp.105-116.


[18] De Angelis, F., Multifield potentials and derivation of extremum principles in rate plasticity, Materials Science Forum, Vol. 539-543, (2007), pp.2625-2630.


[19] De Angelis, F., Evolutive laws and constitutive relations in nonlocal viscoplasticity, Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 152-154, (2012), pp.990-996.


[20] De Angelis, F., A comparative analysis of linear and nonlinear kinematic hardening rules in computational elastoplasticity, Technische Mechanik, Vol. 32, n. 2-5, (2012), pp.164-173.

[21] Alfano, G., De Angelis, F., Rosati, L., General solution procedures in elasto/viscoplasticity, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 190, (2001), pp.5123-5147.


[22] De Angelis, F., Cancellara, D., Modano, M., Pasquino, M., The consequence of different loading rates in elasto/viscoplasticity, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 10, (2011), pp.2911-2916.


[23] De Angelis, F., Cancellara, D., Implications due to different loading programs in inelastic materials, Advanced Material Research, Vol. 422, (2012), pp.726-733.


[24] De Angelis, F., Cancellara, D., Results of distinct modes of loading procedures in the nonlinear inelastic behavior of solids, Advanced Material Research, Vol. 482-484, (2012), pp.1004-1011.