A DEA Based Model for Ranking Air Freighters Operational Efficiency

Abstract:

Article Preview

This paper proposes a benchmarking model useful to rank and select aircraft used in the freight industry. The decision-making problem of aircraft ranking and selection is addressed by implementing an extension of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), i.e. the cross-efficiency calculation. DEA efficiency is a useful indicator to evaluate the value for money of an aircraft in the freight industry and its extension - the cross-efficiency measurement makes it possible to rank aircraft according to this value for money measurements. A sample of 22 air freighters is used to analyze the model validity. DEA scores show that 4 aircraft models only are evaluated as being full 100% efficient, and some old models (i.e., DC 9-10F) are as efficient as the recent aircraft models sold in the market (A300F and A330-200F).

Info:

Periodical:

Edited by:

Dashnor Hoxha

Pages:

155-160

Citation:

C. lo Storto "A DEA Based Model for Ranking Air Freighters Operational Efficiency", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 390, pp. 155-160, 2013

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] The World Bank: Freight transport for development toolkit: Air freight, DFID Technical Report, (http: /siteresources. worldbank. org/EXTURBANTRANSPORT/Resources/341448-1269891107889/urban_freight. pdf) (2009).

[2] The World Bank: Air Freight- A Market Study with Implications for Land locked Countries, TP 26, August (http: /siteresources. worldbank. org/INTTRANSPORT/Resources/336291-1227561426235/5611053-1229359963828/5680661-1253555418746/tp-26-Air_Cargo_Study. pdf) (2009).

[3] O. Čokorilo, S. Gvozdenović S., P. Mirosavljević and L. Vasov: Multi attribute decision making: Assessing the technological and operational parameters of an aircraft, Transport vol. 25 (2010), pp.352-356.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2010.43

[4] A. Fernandez-Castro and P. Smith: Lancaster's characteristics approach revisited: product selection using non-parametric methods. Managerial and Decision Economics, Vol 23 (2002), pp.83-91.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.1048

[5] L.F. Gomes, J.E. de Mattos Fernandes and J.C. de Mello: A fuzzy stochastic approach to the multicriteria selection of an aircraft for regional chartering. J. Adv. Transp. doi: 10. 1002/atr. 206 (online 2012) (forthcoming).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.206

[6] T. Gwo-Hshiung and H. Jih-Jeng: Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications (Chapman and Hall/CRC, USA 2011).

[7] J. Wallenius, J.S. Dyer, P.C. Fishburn, R.E. Steuer, S. Zionts and K. Deb: Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: Recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Management Science Vol. 54 (2008), p.1336–1349.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0838

[8] P. Kumar: Integrated project evaluation and selection using multiple attribute decision-making technique. International Journal of Production Economics Vol. 103 (2006), p.90–103.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.018

[9] K.J. Lancaster: A New Approach to Consumer Theory. Journal of Political Economy Vol. 74 (1966), pp.132-157.

[10] Z. Griliches (Ed. ): Price Index and Quality Change (Harvard University Press, USA 1971).

[11] P.P. Saviotti: An Approach to the Measurement of Technology Based on the Hedonic Price Method and Related Methods, Technological Forecasting and Social Change Vol. 27 (1985), pp.309-334.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(85)90064-2

[12] P.P. Saviotti and J.S. Metcalfe: A Theoretical Approach to the Construction of Technological Output Indicators. Research Policy Vol. 13 (1984), pp.141-151.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90022-2

[13] A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and E. Rhodes: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research Vol. 2 (1978), p.429–444.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8

[14] N. Adler, L. Friedman and Z. Sinuany-Stern: Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 140 (2002), pp.249-265.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0377-2217(02)00068-1

[15] T.R. Sexton, R.H. Silkman and A.J. Hogan, Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions, in: Measuring Efficiency: an Assessment of data Envelopment Analysis, edited by R.H. Silkman, pp.73-105, Jossey-Bass, USA (1986).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1441

[16] R.H. Green, J.R. Doyle and W.D. Cook: Preference voting and project ranking using data envelopment analysis and cross-evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research Vol. 90 (1996), p.461–472.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00039-9

[17] J.R. Doyle and R.H. Green: Comparing products using data envelopment analysis. OMEGA: The International Journal of Management Science Vol. 19 (1991), p.631–638.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(91)90012-i

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.