Reliability Allocation for a System with Complex Redundancy


Article Preview

The paper deals with the possibilities of allocating reliability requirements for a system using complex redundancy. It means system consists of a few identical subsystems and for its common function it is quite enough if only certain part of these subsystems operates. The subsystems not operating at a certain moment serve as redundancy in case that the subsystems which are operating fail. All the system, however, is not a trivial parallel structure, because if the system is to work properly, always more than one subsystem should operate and the subsystems can function only in configurations set in advance. Practical application of the suggested method of reliability allocation is demonstrated for a pantograph system of a high-speed train. In order to provide the proper function of the system, the minimum number of operating pantographs in pre-set configurations providing safe current collection has to be always available. Using some pantograph configurations (e.g. two pantographs being one after another very closely) is in fact not possible for safety reasons. The article presents the procedure of reliability allocation for this specific system. Suggested method is based on a truth table and Boolean algebra application.



Edited by:

Adrian Olaru




Z. Vintr and T. Vintr, "Reliability Allocation for a System with Complex Redundancy", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 436, pp. 505-510, 2013

Online since:

October 2013




[1] IEC 60300-3-4 Dependability management - Part 3-4: Application guide - Guide to the specification of dependability requirements, IEC, Geneva, (2007).


[2] J. Bartak, S. Cornak, R. Balik, Perspective methods of vehicles maintenance, in: Transport Means 2006 - Proceedings of the International Conference, Kaunas University of Technology Kaunas, 2006, pp.183-186.

[3] R. Balik, J. Bartak, S. Cornak, J. Furch, A Relation between Dependability Specific Aspects and Vehicles LCC in Operation and Maintenance, in: Proceedings of 9-th International Conference Transport Means, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, pp.62-65.

[4] W. Kuo, X. Zhu, Importance Measure in Reliability, Risk, and Optimization, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, (2012).

[5] R.F. Stapelberg, Handbook of Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety in Engineering Design, Springer, London, (2009).

[6] W.R. Wessels, Practical reliability engineering and analysis for system design and life-cycle sustainment, CRC Press, Boca Raton (2010).

[7] R. Holub, Z. Vintr, R&M Requirements Allocation in Upgrading a System, in: Proceedings of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, IEEE, New York, 2001, p.258–263.

[8] T. Vintr, M. Vintr, Reliability Allocation of a Vehicle With Regard to Warranty Costs, in: 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012 (PSAM11 ESREL 2012), Curran Associates, Red Hook, 2012, pp.4612-4620.


[9] Z. Vintr, R. Holub, R&M Requirements Allocation in Upgrading a System, in: Proceedings of Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, IEEE, New York: 2001, p.258 – 263.

[10] Y. Wang, R.C.M. Yam, M.J. Zuo, P. Tse, A comprehensive reliability allocation method for design of CNC lathes, in: Reliability Engineering & System Safety, Vol. 72 (2001), No. 3, p.247 – 252.


[11] O. Barborak, P. Liptak, The Vogel's Approximation Method in Military – Technical Practice, in: ICMT´09: International Conference on Military Technologies, University of Defence, Brno, 2010, pp.1-6.

[12] A. Birolini, Reliability Engineering – Theory and Practice, Springer – Verlag, New York, (2004).

[13] IEC 61078 Analysis techniques for dependability – Reliability block diagram and boolean methods, IEC, Geneva, (2006).