A Meta-Heuristic Based Weight Optimisation for Composite Wing Structural Analysis


Article Preview

This paper presents a two-stage meta-heuristic approach to producing weight-optimised solutions needed prior to the detailed finite element analysis of composite wing. Composite wing covers are assumed to take the form of a group of stiffened sub-panels with varying skin and stiffener geometries according to the wing layout and loads. A population of limited solutions satisfying various design constraints was created using layout (skin and stiffener geometry), selected lay-ups, rule based stacking sequence and various assumed loads. The closed form analytical solutions of flat stiffened orthotropic plates are used for calculating buckling reserve factors and strength margins. For each sub-panel, a meta-heuristic rule was imposed to search for a suitable combination of skin and stiffener geometry. The criterion used was minimum weight satisfying laminate continuity accounting for manufacturability. Later, the optimised solutions for each sub-panel are converted into a format supported by the conventional finite element tool (NASTRAN). The use of meta-heuristic approach and their automation in Visual Basic for Applications resulted in fast convergence and potential time-saving compared to genetic algorithms.



Edited by:

Patrick Sean Keogh




V. Sahadevan et al., "A Meta-Heuristic Based Weight Optimisation for Composite Wing Structural Analysis", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vols. 5-6, pp. 305-314, 2006

Online since:

October 2006




[1] M.C.Y. Niu: Airframe Structural Design (Conmilit Press Ltd, Hong Kong, 2 e , 1999).

[2] B. Liu, R.T. Haftka and M.A. Akgun: Composite wing structural optimisation using genetic algorithms and response surfaces, Proc. 39 th AIAA-SDM Conf., California, 20-23 April 1998, Paper 4854.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1998-4854

[3] J.F. Wiggenread, P. Arendsen and J.M.S. Pereira: Design optimisation of stiffened composite panels with buckling and damage tolerance constraints, Proc. 39 th AIAA-SDM Conf., California, 20-23 April 1998, Paper-4853.

[4] L. Lamberti, S. Venkataraman , R.T. Haftka and T.F. Johnson: Preliminary design optimisation of stiffened panels using approximate analysis models, Int. J. Numer. Methods in Engng, Vol. 57. No. 10 (2003), pp.1351-1380.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.781

[5] T. Edwards: Covers Optimisation for Composite Wing Structures (Technical Report 5032278/04/001, ATKINS, UK, 2004). a) In-board panel global buckling λg = 1. 92 b) In-board panel local buckling λl = 1. 84 c) Out-board panel global buckling λg = 2. 16 d) Out-board panel local buckling λl = 1. 86 Fig. 7. Buckling mode shapes from finite element analysis results using 1200 kN.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.04.037

[6] S. Venkataraman and R.T. Haftka: Structural Optimization: What has Moore's law done for us? Proc. 43rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Colorado, 2002, Paper: 1342.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2002-1342

[7] W.J. Stroud: Minimum mass design of filamentary composite panels under combined loads: Design procedures based on simplified buckling equations, (Technical Report, NASA-TN8257, 1976).

[8] B. Liu and R.T. Haftka: Composite wing structural design optimization with continuity constraints, Proc. 42 nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit, Seattle, 2001, Paper: 25021.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1998-1776

[9] A. Mukherjee and B. Varughese B: Design guidelines for ply drop-off in laminated composite structures, Composites- Part B: Engineering, Vol. 32 (2001), pp.153-164.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1359-8368(00)00038-x

[10] S.W. Tsai and H.A.T. Hahn: Introduction to Composite Materials (Technomic Publications, USA, 1980).

[11] R. Muzzolini, S. Veen, A.P. Duarte and J.C. Ehrstrom: Stability analysis of stiffened panels: Analytical and finite element methods, Proc. Worldwide Aerospace Conf. and Techno Showcase, 8-10 April 2002, Toulouse, Paper-164.

[12] C. Blum and A. Roli: Meta-heuristics in combinatorial optimization: Overview and conceptual comparison, ACM computing Surveys, Vol. 35, No. 3 (2003), pp.268-303.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/937503.937505

[13] O. Saarela: Design system of composite laminates (Technical Report A-2, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland, 2005).

[14] S. Vijayakumar: Heuristic Approach based Composite wing Covers Optimisation Tool - Users Manual (ATKINS Aerospace, UK, 2005).

[15] ACAT - Residual Strength after Impact Tool, Version 16, Airbus UK.

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.